mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable MEG Decoding of Perceived Speech: Cortical Sources and the Stimulus Features That Drive Retrieval

arXiv 2608.01481 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.SD q-bio.NCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Short segments of perceived speech can be retrieved from non-invasive magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings by deep networks trained with a CLIP-style objective against wav2vec 2.0 audio embeddings. Yet their weights do not map onto electrophysiological quantities, and it remains unclear which speech properties drive retrieval. We build on a high-performing MEG-to-audio retrieval architecture but redesign both its front end and decoder. Its spatial attention operates on a flattened sensor layout; we replace it with spherical harmonics defined on the three-dimensional MEG helmet geometry. We reduce the subject-specific representation from 270 to 25 branches, add a temporal filter to each branch to match it to a neuronal source in space and time, and make the convolutional decoder shallower. Ocular and cardiac components are removed before training to reduce the risk of stimulus-locked shortcuts. On MEG-MASC, the model reaches 39.75 +/- 0.34% Top-1 accuracy among 1005 candidates across six trained solutions, with about 20 times fewer decoder parameters. Its weights map to source space, recovering generators consistent with the speech-perception network, while left-lateralized branches carry higher-frequency rhythmic components not evident on the right. Paired MEG occlusion shows that 15 of 19 stimulus features contribute, with the largest effects for silence, sound intensity, vowels, and acoustic onsets. Random word lists behave oppositely: substituting narrative MEG into them improves retrieval, indicating that activity without narrative structure carries less recoverable information than activity during coherent speech. The wav2vec target can be reduced to about twelve learned feature dimensions without loss of accuracy, whereas strong temporal compression causes a clear loss. Together, source mapping and input interventions reveal what drives retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 77 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  3. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  4. 2016EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfacescited by 616
  5. 2022Decoding speech perception from non-invasive brain recordingscited by 129
  6. 2022Toward a realistic model of speech processing in the brain with self-supervised learningcited by 63
  7. 2022Self-supervised models of audio effectively explain human cortical responses to speechcited by 37
  8. 2018Compact Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Asynchronous Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentialscited by 15
  9. 2024Geodesic Optimization for Predictive Shift Adaptation on EEG datacited by 9
  10. 2018Adaptive neural network classifier for decoding MEG signalscited by 3
  11. 2026Mechanistic Interpretability of EEG Foundation Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 3
  12. 2026Mechanistic Interpretability of Brain-to-Speech Models Across Speech Modescited by 1
2 more
  1. 2026What Are We Actually Decoding? Source Attribution for Non-Invasive Brain-to-Language Retrievalcited by 1
  2. 2026Mapping Whisper Representations to Human ECoG Responses with Interpretable Time-Resolved Neural Encodingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.