mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeBERTa-Sentinel: Toward Transparent and Trustworthy Detection of AI-Generated Text

arXiv 2608.01046 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid spread of large language models (LLMs) across the web raises concerns about misinformation, academic integrity, automated content manipulation, and risks to vulnerable online communities. Existing transformer-based detectors, such as GPT-Sentinel, show promise but struggle to generalize to diverse model outputs and paraphrasing attacks, limiting their role in building trustworthy web ecosystems. This work introduces DeBERTa-Sentinel, a responsible AI-generated text detection framework leveraging DeBERTa-v3's disentangled attention to capture subtle structural irregularities in synthetic content. A central design principle is transparency: unlike black-box commercial detectors, DeBERTa-Sentinel exposes token-level explanations of its decisions, enabling affected stakeholders journalists, educators, and platform trust and safety teams to audit, challenge, and contextualize detection outcomes. Using the GLC-AIText dataset of 28,057 human and LLM-generated samples (GPT, LLaMA, and Claude) with a 60-20-20 split, DeBERTa-Sentinel achieves 98.21% validation accuracy and surpasses the RoBERTa-Sentinel baseline from NeurIPS 2025, achieving 97.53% test accuracy, 95.89% precision, 99.33% recall, and 99.53% ROC-AUC, and maintaining a 0.665% false negative rate. The model's interpretability reveals linguistic markers such as academic phrasing and formal transitions associated with synthetic text, directly supporting stakeholder needs for verifiable, auditable content-authenticity decisions. By advancing responsible detection methods that reduce bias and enhance explainability, DeBERTa-Sentinel promotes trustworthy, ethical, and human-centric AI systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Galileo-Galili/HUMAN-VS-AI-TEXT-DETECTION.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  6. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  7. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  8. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  9. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
  10. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
  11. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  12. 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
8 more
  1. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
  2. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  3. 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 90
  4. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  5. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 43
  6. 2024HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainabilitycited by 3
  7. 2025Sarang at DEFACTIFY 4.0: Detecting AI-Generated Text Using Noised Data and an Ensemble of DeBERTa Modelscited by 3
  8. 2025Unified Large Language Models for Misinformation Detection in Low-Resource Linguistic Settingscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.