Isotropy Cliffs: The Geometric Signature of Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the geometry of decision-making in Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) through the lens of isotropy. Analyzing five open-weight models across diverse datasets, we identify decision-critical transition layers characterized by a shift in isotropy, coinciding with a major representational change and the emergence of task-relevant clusters. We demonstrate that this synchronized geometric behavior is strongly correlated with downstream accuracy (r≈0.84), displaying its relevance for successful decision-making. Furthermore, we show that this transition is robust to prompt variations, suggesting that it reflects a general mechanism of model behavior.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 246
20 more
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
- 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 218
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 199
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 145
- 2019HEAD-QA: A Healthcare Dataset for Complex Reasoningcited by 100
- 2024How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden Statescited by 92
- 2024Emergence of a High-Dimensional Abstraction Phase in Language Transformerscited by 56
- 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 52
- 2023Exploring the Sensitivity of LLMs' Decision-Making Capabilities: Insights from Prompt Variation and Hyperparameterscited by 32
- 2024Beyond Probabilities: Unveiling the Misalignment in Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025The Intrinsic Dimension of Prompts in Internal Representations of Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2022On Isotropy, Contextualization and Learning Dynamics of Contrastive-based Sentence Representation Learningcited by 15
- 2023Outlier Dimensions Encode Task-Specific Knowledgecited by 15
- 2021Low Anisotropy Sense Retrofitting (LASeR) : Towards Isotropic and Sense Enriched Representationscited by 13
- 2025Redundancy, Isotropy, and Intrinsic Dimensionality of Prompt-based Text Embeddingscited by 10
- 2025Geometry of Decision Making in Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025From Topology to Retrieval: Decoding Embedding Spaces with Unified Signaturescited by 4
- 2025Effect of Selection Format on LLM Performancecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.