mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Uncertainty-Driven Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Broad-Coverage RF Modulation Recognition

arXiv 2608.00796 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2026eess.SP cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic RF modulation recognition is of critical importance in spectrum monitoring, electronic warfare, and cognitive radio applications, where low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions and the growing diversity of modulation schemes limit the performance of existing methods. This paper proposes an uncertainty-driven hybrid deep learning architecture for recognizing RF signals over a broad modulation space. The proposed approach carries out a multi-stage classification process by combining spectral information obtained through low-cost FFT-based preprocessing with time-frequency features extracted from short-time Fourier transform (STFT) spectrograms. The architecture comprises a 2D convolutional neural network (2D CNN)-based path for fast, low-latency primary classification, MC Dropout-supported Bayesian uncertainty estimation for assessing classification reliability, and a BiLSTM-based secondary decision mechanism activated under high-uncertainty conditions. The proposed system is evaluated in a controlled simulation environment spanning different SNR levels and modulation classes. Experimental results show that the primary 2D CNN path achieves 83.3±0.7% accuracy with an inference time of only 0.138 ms per sample, providing superior performance compared with traditional rule-based and classical machine-learning approaches. Furthermore, the obtained findings reveal the limitations of compact spectral feature representations and classifiers lacking temporal modeling, particularly in disambiguating FSK-based modulations. The uncertainty estimation module offers promising results for detecting low-confidence decisions, and the proposed approach demonstrates the potential of a low-latency and scalable solution for real-time RF modulation recognition.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 23 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  5. 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 233
  6. 2017Over the Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classificationcited by 121
  7. 2017Distributed Deep Learning Models for Wireless Signal Classification with Low-Cost Spectrum Sensorscited by 44
  8. 2017Deep Architectures for Modulation Recognitioncited by 33
  9. 2017Deep Neural Network Architectures for Modulation Classificationcited by 18
  10. 2022Deep Learning Based Automatic Modulation Recognition: Models, Datasets, and Challengescited by 16
  11. 2024Enhancing Automatic Modulation Recognition through Robust Global Feature Extractioncited by 7
  12. 2023Open Set Wireless Signal Classification: Augmenting Deep Learning with Expert Feature Classifierscited by 2
5 more
  1. 2023Class Information Guided Reconstruction for Automatic Modulation Open-Set Recognitioncited by 2
  2. 2024MAMCA -- Optimal on Accuracy and Efficiency for Automatic Modulation Classification with Extended Signal Lengthcited by 2
  3. 2025AI/ML-Based Automatic Modulation Recognition: Recent Trends and Future Possibilitiescited by 2
  4. 2025CNN-LSTM Hybrid Architecture for Over-the-Air Automatic Modulation Classification Using SDRcited by 2
  5. 2025An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Deep Learning-Based Automatic Modulation Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.