Experience-Calibrated Contrastive Decoding for Mitigating Hallucinations in LM-Based Text-to-Speech
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language model-based text-to-speech (LM-based TTS) remains vulnerable to speech hallucinations that deviate from the target text. Existing mitigation mainly relies on architectural changes or additional training, while decoding-time control remains underexplored. We present a conditional information view that distinguishes text-derived alignment information from experience information supplied by acoustic context and learned speech regularities. We hypothesize that an important class of hallucinations begins when alignment support is insufficiently reflected in the selected token at a vulnerable transition. Using predictions from the same speech LM with and without text conditions, we propose Experience-Calibrated Contrastive Decoding (ECCD), a training-free method that strengthens alignment support while preserving useful experience information. ECCD preserves the original expert distribution, applies only positive alignment enhancement, and calibrates its strength using set-level experience compatibility. Across four models, ECCD reduces WER/CER by up to 55.6% in all SeedTTS-Eval settings and 24 of 25 multilingual CV3-Eval settings. A listening test yields a CMOS gain of +0.644 while retaining strong speaker similarity. Further analysis shows that alignment influence and decision-level gain vary within linguistic units and are lower at first-error boundaries than at matched correct boundaries. Overall, these extensive experiments and analyses identify conditional information control as a promising decoding-time direction for mitigating speech hallucination.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 31 references.
References · 22
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2023Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizerscited by 752
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2022UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 390
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2024XTTS: a Massively Multilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Modelcited by 179
- 2025CosyVoice 3: Towards In-the-wild Speech Generation via Scaling-up and Post-trainingcited by 150
- 2024VALL-E 2: Neural Codec Language Models are Human Parity Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizerscited by 122
10 more
- 2024VoiceCraft: Zero-Shot Speech Editing and Text-to-Speech in the Wildcited by 120
- 2023CAM++: A Fast and Efficient Network for Speaker Verification Using Context-Aware Maskingcited by 102
- 2024BASE TTS: Lessons from building a billion-parameter Text-to-Speech model on 100K hours of datacited by 75
- 2024ELLA-V: Stable Neural Codec Language Modeling with Alignment-guided Sequence Reorderingcited by 50
- 2024VALL-T: Decoder-Only Generative Transducer for Robust and Decoding-Controllable Text-to-Speechcited by 23
- 2024Improving Robustness of LLM-based Speech Synthesis by Learning Monotonic Alignmentcited by 22
- 2024TouchTTS: An Embarrassingly Simple TTS Framework that Everyone Can Touchcited by 10
- 2024Attention-Constrained Inference for Robust Decoder-Only Text-to-Speechcited by 6
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in LM-Based TTS Models via Distribution Alignment Using GFlowNetscited by 2
- 2025Eliminating stability hallucinations in llm-based tts models via attention guidancecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.