Select-And-Extract: A Lightweight Plugin for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for language model (LM) systems fundamentally has two failure modes: retrieval failure and reading failure. The former fails to recall the right pieces of information from the external corpus, and the latter fails to produce the correct answer although the right information is retrieved. Some methods perform structured indexing for retrieval failure, but may suffer from limited generalization of the fixed structures. Some methods perform query-time structuring for reading failure, but typically require a lot of LM calls and rely heavily on the LM's capability. To this end, we propose Select-ANd-Extract (SANE), a simple yet effective plugin for RAG. For the retrieval failure, we retrieve a wide set of candidates with a semantic retriever, and leverage the LM to select the top candidates based on their synopses, which yields better recall than the original retriever. For the reading failure, we perform blueprint-guided query-time evidence extraction, which allows the generator LM to use only compact and structured key information so that it can perform better reasoning. Empirical results confirm that SANE brings solid improvements, while only introducing modest extra overhead. As a lightweight plugin for RAG, SANE offers a simple alternative to heavier approaches, and suggests a high-performance RAG framework need not be overly complex.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
References · 15
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 707
- 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 532
- 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 270
- 2019Document Expansion by Query Predictioncited by 231
- 2020Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrievalcited by 214
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models
- 2025PRGB Benchmark: A Robust Placeholder-Assisted Algorithm for Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2025Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey