mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Loanword or Switch? The Annotation Boundary, Not the Model, Drives Kazakh-Russian Code-Switching Identification

arXiv 2608.00581 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Off-the-shelf LID and letter heuristics over-label Kazakh-Russian social text as mixed: Russian loanwords inside Kazakh look like code-switching under a shared Cyrillic script. We release a document-level gold LID set whose guideline keeps integrated borrowings as Kazakh and reserves mixed for clause-level switches, plus a mixed-only sentiment pool used after LID in a filter-first cascade. On a shared LID test, FastText, Lingua, raw and windowed HeLI, character-trigram NB, and XLM-R range from weak to strong performance. The gap shows the bottleneck is the loanword-vs-switch annotation boundary, not model class alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 7 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023An Open Dataset and Model for Language Identificationcited by 50
  2. 2018Automatic Language Identification in Texts: A Surveycited by 41
  3. 2023Shared Lexical Items as Triggers of Code Switchingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.