mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TraceViT: Grounded Trace Supervision for Visual Abstract Reasoning

arXiv 2607.29586 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) tests whether a model can infer an unseen transformation from a few input-output examples and apply it to a new grid. Looped visual reasoners refine predictions over multiple iterations, but conventional training constrains only the final output, leaving intermediate refinements unconstrained. We propose that these refinements should instead follow the transformation step by step. We introduce TraceViT, a looped visual reasoner trained with semantically monotonic transformation chains. We obtain these chains by rewriting and verifying programmatic task implementations, decomposing each solution into intermediate grid states. Each iteration is grounded by a task reference derived from the few-shot demonstrations and an object workspace representing the current grid state. Because these chains may differ in length from the loop, soft trace alignment enforces only their ordering, letting the model allocate iterations freely. TraceViT achieves 67.8% pass@2 on ARC-AGI-1 and 24.3% on ARC-AGI-2. Controlled ablations on ARC-AGI-1 show that trace supervision becomes beneficial only when paired with grounding. Code and data will be available at https://github.com/LiuBinnan/TraceViT.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  3. 2017Soft-DTW: a Differentiable Loss Function for Time-Seriescited by 271
  4. 2023LLMs and the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus: Successes, Failures, and the Importance of Object-based Representationscited by 82
  5. 2022Improving Object-centric Learning with Query Optimizationcited by 60
  6. 2024Combining Induction and Transduction for Abstract Reasoningcited by 53
  7. 2025Self-Improving Language Models for Evolutionary Program Synthesis: A Case Study on ARC-AGIcited by 36
  8. 2022Graphs, Constraints, and Search for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 32
  9. 2021Neural-guided, Bidirectional Program Search for Abstraction and Reasoningcited by 23
  10. 2025Product of Experts with LLMs: Boosting Performance on ARC Is a Matter of Perspectivecited by 17
  11. 2026LoopViT: Scaling Visual ARC with Looped Transformerscited by 15
  12. 2024Slot Abstractors: Toward Scalable Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 11
11 more
  1. 2024Towards Efficient Neurally-Guided Program Induction for ARC-AGIcited by 11
  2. 2024Generalized Planning for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 10
  3. 2024Tackling the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus with Vision Transformers: the Importance of 2D Representation, Positions, and Objectscited by 10
  4. 2025ARC-GEN: A Mimetic Procedural Benchmark Generator for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 10
  5. 2024ConceptSearch: Towards Efficient Program Search Using LLMs for Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC)cited by 8
  6. 2023Tackling the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) with Object-centric Models and the MDL Principlecited by 7
  7. 2025Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: How and why deep learning for ARCcited by 7
  8. 2026Tiny Recursive Reasoning with Mamba-2 Attention Hybridcited by 7
  9. 2025Test-time Adaptation of Tiny Recursive Modelscited by 5
  10. 2026Slots, Transitions, Loops: Learning Composable World Models for ARCcited by 2
  11. 2025ARCTraj: A Dataset and Benchmark of Human Reasoning Trajectories for Abstract Problem Solvingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.