mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Linear Proposal Operators and Stochastic Search Geometry in SOMA and Differential Evolution

arXiv 2607.29228 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.NE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Swarm and evolutionary algorithms are usually analyzed as complete procedural systems in which nonlinear selection, replacement, and adaptation obscure simpler structure within candidate generation. This paper introduces an operator--selection factorization that separates objective-independent variation from boundary repair and fitness-dependent selection, and uses it to study the proposal geometry of the Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm (SOMA) and Differential Evolution (DE). The canonical SOMA proposal is shown to be affine in the search space and exactly linear in an augmented migrant--leader state. In leader-relative coordinates, the resulting operator provides a direct interpretation of interpolation, projection, overshooting, and coordinate masking. Under Bernoulli perturbation masks, we derive closed-form expressions for the proposal mean, covariance, expected squared step length, expected squared distance from the leader, active dimensionality, and coordinate coverage. For canonical DE/rand/1/bin, we derive the finite-population moments of differential mutation and characterize the additional covariance and coordinate dependence induced by forced-coordinate binomial crossover. Exact enumeration and Monte Carlo experiments verify the analytical identities and quantify the effects of mask conditioning, boundary repair, and fitness-based selection. The analysis further motivates geometry-controlled and rotation-aware SOMA variants, together with an adaptive population-reducing extension of iSOMA. Experiments on the complete noiseless BBOB benchmark show that these operator-guided variants substantially improve upon canonical SOMA and are competitive with established DE methods in several dimension--budget regimes. The results demonstrate how proposal-level operator analysis can support both the interpretation and design of population-based optimizers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 47 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 138
  2. 2013A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problemscited by 77
  3. 2017Best practices for comparing optimization algorithmscited by 10
  4. 2020Differential Evolution with Reversible Linear Transformationscited by 8
  5. 2020A Survey on Recent Progress in the Theory of Evolutionary Algorithms for Discrete Optimizationcited by 4
  6. 2025Optimization Strategies for Variational Quantum Algorithms in Noisy Landscapescited by 3
  7. 2026A Longitudinal Analysis of the CEC Single-Objective Competitions (2010-2024) and Implications for Variational Quantum Optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.