mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transpiler Autotuning with Predictive Models for Quantum Circuit Optimization

arXiv 2607.29145 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026quant-ph cs.LG cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum software engineering is an emerging research field focusing on efficiently embedding the quantum programming paradigm into existing software ecosystems. A key aspect of this field is the realization of quantum algorithms using gate-based programming and the subsequent low-level optimization of the resulting quantum circuits, a process that is commonly performed by so-called transpilation pipelines. One significant challenge in these pipelines is determining which optimizations to apply to a given circuit. This decision is usually based on fixed default configurations that are uniformly applied to all circuits, frequently resulting in missed opportunities for more aggressive circuit optimization. In this work, we tackle this challenge by applying autotuning with supervised machine learning to develop an automated method for selection of transpiler passes. To train our machine-learning models, we employ feature-model based sampling to generate a representative dataset that examines how different combinations of Qiskit transpiler passes perform across thousands of circuits drawn from the state-of-the-art benchmarking suite MQT Bench. Using these data, we build a predictive model extension for the Qiskit transpilation pipeline that uses a machine learning model to automatically select combinations of transpiler passes aiming to achieve a maximum reduction in two-qubit gates. Our empirical evaluation shows that the combinations selected by our model are never outperformed by Qiskit's optimization levels, achieve on average an additional 19.1% - 32.4% reduction in two-qubit gates, and for some circuits finds reductions of up to 95.8% in cases where Qiskit achieves no reduction at all.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 85 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  4. 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 97
  5. 2018A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine Learningcited by 40
  6. 2018Finding Faster Configurations using FLASHcited by 32
  7. 2020Topological Quantum Compiling with Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  8. 2024Practical and efficient quantum circuit synthesis and transpiling with Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  9. 2019Learning Software Configuration Spaces: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 14
  10. 2022SupermarQ: A Scalable Quantum Benchmark Suitecited by 14
  11. 2021Variational quantum compiling with double Q-learningcited by 13
  12. 2023Quarl: A Learning-Based Quantum Circuit Optimizercited by 10
6 more
  1. 2017Using Bad Learners to find Good Configurationscited by 8
  2. 2024AlphaRouter: Quantum Circuit Routing with Reinforcement Learning and Tree Searchcited by 8
  3. 2018Q#: Enabling scalable quantum computing and development with a high-level domain-specific languagecited by 7
  4. 2024Qrisp: A Framework for Compilable High-Level Programming of Gate-Based Quantum Computerscited by 4
  5. 2025Graph Neural Network-Based Predictor for Optimal Quantum Hardware Selectioncited by 2
  6. 2025Analyzing the Evolution and Maintenance of Quantum Software Repositoriescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.