Efficient LLM Adversarial Training via Low-Rank Defense and Circuit-Guided Surrogates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training is one of the most effective defenses against adversarial attacks, yet the computational cost remains prohibitive at modern scales, especially for large language models (LLMs). While existing mitigation strategies, e.g., latent adversarial training (LAT), have been developed, they still incur a high computational cost. In this work, focusing on LLM-based classifiers, we investigate computation-efficient strategies to speed up LAT from two complementary perspectives: (1) Defense-side optimization: We explore representation fine-tuning (ReFT) within LAT, and reveal a potential issue if there is a mismatch on which tokens to apply ReFT and the attack. (2) Attack-side optimization: When computing adversarial attacks in each LAT iteration, we extract only the relevant circuits from the LLM to construct a lightweight surrogate model, avoiding the computation in the forward-backward passes through the full model during the attack generation. For both perspectives, we provide theoretical justifications and numerical evidence to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategies. Compared to standard LAT with full fine-tuning, our method on average reduces per-step adversarial-training FLOPs by 29.6% while requiring only 0.0118% trainable parameters, at a moderate cost in robustness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
49 of 59 references.
References · 49
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
37 more
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 196
- 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 186
- 2024A Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment Algorithms: A Case Study on DPO and Toxicitycited by 179
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 173
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 171
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
- 2021Inductive Biases and Variable Creation in Self-Attention Mechanismscited by 144
- 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 144
- 2023Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Gamecited by 135
- 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attackscited by 104
- 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 82
- 2024Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysiscited by 61
- 2024Towards Understanding Safety Alignment: A Mechanistic Perspective from Safety Neuronscited by 47
- 2025Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 47
- 2025Bypassing LLM Guardrails: An Empirical Analysis of Evasion Attacks against Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Detection Systemscited by 24
- 2024Scaling Trends in Language Model Robustnesscited by 18
- 2025Softmax is 1/2-Lipschitz: A tight bound across all ℓp normscited by 18
- 2025A General Framework to Enhance Fine-tuning-based LLM Unlearningcited by 12
- 2025MixAT: Combining Continuous and Discrete Adversarial Training for LLMscited by 10
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2025Towards Context-Robust LLMs: A Gated Representation Fine-tuning Approachcited by 6
- 2025Watching the AI Watchdogs: A Fairness and Robustness Analysis of AI Safety Moderation Classifierscited by 5
- 2025Alignment-Constrained Dynamic Pruning for LLMs: Identifying and Preserving Alignment-Critical Circuitscited by 4
- 2025Impact of Positional Encoding: Clean and Adversarial Rademacher Complexity for Transformers under In-Context Regressioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.