RareSense: Rarity-Aware Similarity Search for Anomaly Retrieval in Transactional Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Similarity search over sparse set-valued data is often dominated by frequent background attributes because classical measures such as Jaccard, cosine, and Hamming compare objects through atomic overlap. IDF (Inverse document frequency) weighting partially reduces this effect but remains atom-wise and cannot explicitly represent informative higher-order co-occurrences. We introduce RareSense, a rarity-aware similarity framework for sparse transactional anomaly data. RareSense mines minimal rare itemsets as intermediate structures, derives reliable rare association rules, maps objects into sparse rare-rule profiles, and compares them using weighted Jaccard similarity. Rule weights combine inverse support, confidence, lift, structural complexity, and stability, so that neighborhoods are determined by shared rare evidence rather than uniform feature overlap. We show that IDF-weighted Jaccard is a restricted singleton case of RareSense, and that the induced distance is a pseudometric on the original objects and a metric over equivalence classes defined by identical rule profiles. Experiments across four benchmark families spanning cybersecurity and general categorical domains show that RareSense attains the highest observed macro-average query-conditioned retrieval performance among the evaluated similarity measures. The statistical analysis indicates significant overall differences, with corrected paired comparisons favoring RareSense over the atomic baselines. The gains remain workload-dependent and are strongest when anomalies share repeatable rare higher-order structure. For global anomaly ranking, RareSense achieves the highest observed macro-average performance while remaining statistically comparable to several strong dedicated detectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 63 references.
References · 12
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
- 2020COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detectioncited by 143
- 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 90
- 2024Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 40
- 2025Deep Learning Advancements in Anomaly Detection: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 15
- 2025Foundation Models and Transformers for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 8
- 2022Anomaly detection using data depth: multivariate casecited by 4
- 2023ALGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Adjusted-LSTM GANcited by 4
- 2025From One Attack Domain to Another: Contrastive Transfer Learning with Siamese Networks for APT Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.