mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Sentiment: Structured Information Extraction from Financial News

arXiv 2607.28496 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Financial sentiment analysis has become a standard component in news-driven stock prediction, yet it reduces rich, multi-dimensional news articles to a single polarity score. We hypothesize that financial news encodes multiple orthogonal information dimensions---event type, impact scope, temporal horizon, and semantic confidence---that sentiment alone cannot capture, and that these dimensions carry independent predictive value. To test this hypothesis, we propose a structured information extraction framework that leverages LLaMA-3.1-70B to extract six semantic dimensions from financial news. Through large-scale experiments on 41,618 news--stock pairs from the FNSPID dataset, we find that (i) FinBERT sentiment features exhibit strong predictive power under nonlinear models (F1=0.576) but substantially weaker performance under linear models (F1=0.230), revealing a highly nonlinear sentiment--return relationship; (ii) LLM-extracted structured features, while individually weaker, capture information orthogonal to sentiment, as evidenced by a 53.5% systematic disagreement rate between the two approaches; and (iii) combining both signal sources yields F1=0.600, significantly outperforming either alone (p < 0.0001), with consistent improvements across all seven event types. Ablation experiments confirm that non-sentiment structural dimensions (event type, impact subject, time horizon, confidence) independently contribute DeltaF1 = +0.019 beyond FinBERT alone. Feature importance analysis reveals balanced contributions from all six extracted dimensions (14--21%), demonstrating that compressing news into a single sentiment score incurs substantial information loss. Our results suggest that the sentiment--semantics decoupling in financial text is systematic and exploitable, opening a new direction for multi-dimensional financial NLP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 17 references.

References · 10

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  5. 2019FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 378
  6. 2013Good Debt or Bad Debt: Detecting Semantic Orientations in Economic Textscited by 310
  7. 2023Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Modelscited by 125
  8. 2018Temporal Relational Ranking for Stock Predictioncited by 100
  9. 2017Listening to Chaotic Whispers: A Deep Learning Framework for News-oriented Stock Trend Predictioncited by 60
  10. 2023The Wall Street Neophyte: A Zero-Shot Analysis of ChatGPT Over MultiModal Stock Movement Prediction Challengescited by 59

Built on by

Not cited yet.