mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness Pruning: Locating Demographic Bias in GLU-MLP Layers via Differential Activations

arXiv 2607.28319 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.CY cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work presents Fairness Pruning, a lightweight structural intervention method designed for the management and future mitigation of demographic bias in large language models (LLMs). As a foundational empirical validation of this method, this work focuses on causal bias localization. Using minimally contrastive prompt pairs and inference-time activation capture, the method identifies neurons that react differentially when processing demographic attributes in GLU architectures, evaluating the signal at the down_proj input. Empirical evaluation was conducted on models of up to 3 billion parameters (Llama-3.2 family and Salamandra-2B), combining standardized benchmark evaluation with qualitative text generation experiments. Results demonstrate that zeroing the identified neurons alters how the model responds to associated demographic variables. However, rather than producing flat mitigation, the intervention causes bidirectional bias destabilization: because BiasScore is unsigned, candidate sets mix neurons that push toward and against the stereotype, and the net effect on aggregate bias depends on which sign dominates. The intervention is extremely surgical: zeroing at most 40 neurons in Llama-3.2-1B (less than 0.031% of total MLP width) achieves a mean retention of 99.49% in reasoning and general knowledge capabilities. These findings empirically confirm that demographic bias processing and model capabilities operate on dissociable circuits, establishing the methodological foundations for transitioning from blind zeroing toward directional behavior modulation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

36 of 43 references.

References · 36

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  8. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  9. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  10. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
  11. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  12. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
24 more
  1. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  2. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  3. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
  4. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
  5. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  6. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 643
  7. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  8. 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 590
  9. 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 561
  10. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
  11. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
  12. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 442
  13. 2023The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variantscited by 300
  14. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  15. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
  16. 2020CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Modelscited by 117
  17. 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
  18. 2024CompactifAI: Extreme Compression of Large Language Models using Quantum-Inspired Tensor Networkscited by 29
  19. 2025Salamandra Technical Reportcited by 9
  20. 2024Evaluating and Mitigating Social Bias for Large Language Models in Open-ended Settingscited by 8
  21. 2025Fragile Knowledge, Robust Instruction-Following: The Width Pruning Dichotomy in Llama-3.2cited by 2
  22. 2025EsBBQ and CaBBQ: The Spanish and Catalan Bias Benchmarks for Question Answeringcited by 1
  23. 2025"The Dentist is an involved parent, the bartender is not": Revealing Implicit Biases in QA with Implicit BBQcited by 1
  24. 2026Tracing Stereotypes in Pre-trained Transformers: From Biased Neurons to Fairer Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.