mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Event-Structured Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Differentiable Critical Clearing Boundaries

arXiv 2607.27681 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transient-stability assessment determines whether a power system can recover after a disturbance and is therefore essential to preventing generator trips and cascading outages. A key metric is the critical clearing time (CCT), which specifies the maximum time available to clear a fault before synchronism is lost. Reliable CCT estimation is challenging because complicated fault-clearing dynamics require repeated simulations over many fault severities and clearing times. We propose an event-structured physics-informed neural network (ES-PINN) that aligns its representation with the pre-fault, fault-on, and post-clearing swing dynamics and enforces exact state chaining across event interfaces. A smooth trajectory-induced stability margin defines a differentiable approximation of the CCT boundary, enabling accurate boundary extraction, local sensitivity analysis, and optional direct CCT prediction through a distilled readout. We further prove a local residual-to-trajectory-to-CCT error estimate, in which exact event chaining eliminates separate state-interface defect terms. Experiments on IEEE 9-, 14-, and 30-bus systems show that ES-PINN consistently improves held-out trajectory and stability-boundary accuracy over matched neural-surrogate baselines across mechanical and electrical contingencies with multiple clearing configurations. Additional full-network DAE validation, multi-fault experiments, and runtime analyses further demonstrate the effectiveness and computational efficiency of the proposed framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 14 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
  4. 2019Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Power Systemscited by 80
  5. 2021DAE-PINN: A Physics-Informed Neural Network Model for Simulating Differential-Algebraic Equations with Application to Power Networkscited by 28
  6. 2023Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Time-Domain Simulations: Accuracy, Computational Cost, and Flexibilitycited by 13
  7. 2021Capturing Power System Dynamics by Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Optimizationcited by 6
  8. 2020Critical Clearing Time Sensitivity for Differential-Algebraic Power System Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.