Theatre Chapbooks At Scale: A Statistical Comparative Analysis of Typography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a statistical methodology that quantifies the similarity of typefaces between printed historical books. This provides a tool that accelerates philological analysis. Using character prototypes derived from clustering and aligning automatically extracted character images, the method defines a typeface distance between any two books. To produce actionable outputs, we develop an a contrario statistical framework to interpret the significance of the computed typeface distances. We apply the method to the philological study of 17 th -century Spanish printed theatre chapbooks in a quantity that exceeds the capabilities of systematic visual inspection by human experts. Our method enables the automatic comparison of Roman and Italic types extracted from different books. After validation by human experts, our method has led to new printer attributions being discovered, and former printer attributions being revised. This success strongly suggests that our method has the potential to enable digital bibliography on a larger scale than was previously possible.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 32 references.
References · 7
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2019Convolutional Character Networkscited by 61
- 2024An Interpretable Deep Learning Approach for Morphological Script Type Analysiscited by 3
- 2025Improving OCR using internal document redundancycited by 3
- 2017Automatic Compositor Attribution in the First Folio of Shakespearecited by 2
- 2023Contrastive Attention Networks for Attribution of Early Modern Printcited by 1
- 2024Clustering Running Titles to Understand the Printing of Early Modern Bookscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.