mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AgentSnare: Learning to Delay, Divert, and Defuse Autonomous Penetration Agents

arXiv 2607.26998 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents automate penetration testing through an observation-action loop, selecting actions based on observations returned by tools. This dependence allows defenders to inject deceptive observations that can mislead the agent's decision-making process. However, existing defenses rely heavily on static, isolated artifacts planted in the environment prior to an attack. Advanced agents can progressively recognize and bypass these artifacts, ultimately refocusing their exploitation attempts on the real target. To address this issue, we introduce AgentSnare, a trajectory-adaptive deception system that dynamically unfolds a decoy environment to continually steer the penetration agent away from the real target. Specifically, AgentSnare employs an artifact-construction policy model that constructs candidate artifacts conditioned on the agent's interaction history and decoy state. AgentSnare then validates these candidates and incrementally incorporates valid artifacts into a factually consistent decoy environment, thereby delaying the attack by absorbing its tool calls, diverting its post-entry trajectory within the decoy, and defusing it by inducing completion reports grounded in decoy evidence. Across 15 CVE-Bench web applications and three attacker models, AgentSnare absorbs 46.8% of the agent's tool calls in the decoy and retains 55.9% of post-entry actions there, while 90.0% of completion attempts are grounded in decoy evidence; across all 45 attacker-CVE pairs, no real target is successfully exploited at pass@3.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Cyber-Zero: Training Cybersecurity Agents without Runtime29 Jul
  2. 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities21 Mar
  3. 2025VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework23 Jan
  4. 2024LLM Agent Honeypot: Monitoring AI Hacking Agents in the Wild17 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 338
  4. 2023FireAct: Toward Language Agent Fine-tuningcited by 256
  5. 2023LLM in the Shell: Generative Honeypotscited by 19
  6. 2024Hacking Back the AI-Hacker: Prompt Injection as a Defense Against LLM-driven Cyberattackscited by 15
  7. 2025MAJIC: Markovian Adaptive Jailbreaking via Iterative Composition of Diverse Innovative Strategiescited by 14
  8. 2026DARWIN: Evolving Jailbreak Adversary and Guardrail for LLM Safety Evaluation and Protectioncited by 6
  9. 2025From Topology to Behavioral Semantics: Enhancing BGP Security by Understanding BGP's Language with LLMscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentDrift: A Step-Labeled Benchmark of Injection-Hijacked LLM Agent Trajectories
  2. 2026PI-Hunter: Automated Red-Teaming for Exposing and Localizing Prompt Injections
  3. 2026APT-Agent: Automated Penetration Testing using Large Language Models
  4. 2026AgentSentry: Mitigating Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents via Temporal Causal Diagnostics and Context Purification
  5. 2026DriftNet: A Dual-Head Trajectory Transformer for Detecting and Localizing Prompt Injection in LLM Agents
  6. 2024AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
  7. 2026ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense ↗
  8. 2026Trace: Unmasking AI Attack Agents Through Terminal Behavior Fingerprinting ↗