mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Keypoints to Predictive Distributions: Post-Hoc Uncertainty for YOLO-Pose Models

arXiv 2607.26921 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

YOLO-Pose models provide efficient keypoint localization, but do not quantify the associated spatial uncertainty. We introduce a lightweight post-hoc probabilistic extension that augments a trained YOLO-Pose model with calibrated bivariate predictive distributions over keypoint locations, centered at the model's original predictions. Concretely, we train additional probabilistic heads with an importance-weighted negative log-likelihood to predict an input-dependent 2×2 dispersion matrix for each keypoint, followed by Gaussian calibration for broad downstream compatibility or Student-t calibration for distributional fidelity. Complementing this, we propose an evaluation protocol that combines a suite of distributional calibration diagnostics with average keypoint precision (AKP), a keypoint-level extension of the COCO AP protocol for assessing reliability rankings. Experiments on COCO show that the learned uncertainty estimates enable effective keypoint-level reliability ranking, Student-t calibration best captures the empirical residual distribution, and uncertainty-based pruning removes unreliable keypoints. A central application-level demonstration is vision-based aircraft landing, where calibrated covariances for runway keypoints support uncertainty-aware aircraft position estimation and downstream sensor fusion.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

23 of 40 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  7. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
  8. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  9. 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
  10. 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
  11. 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
  12. 2021Human Pose Regression with Residual Log-likelihood Estimationcited by 131
11 more
  1. 2022On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networkscited by 119
  2. 2019Gaussian YOLOv3: An Accurate and Fast Object Detector Using Localization Uncertainty for Autonomous Drivingcited by 105
  3. 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
  4. 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 88
  5. 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 85
  6. 2022YOLO-Pose: Enhancing YOLO for Multi Person Pose Estimation Using Object Keypoint Similarity Losscited by 66
  7. 2019Uncertainty Estimation in One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 36
  8. 2022Faithful Heteroscedastic Regression with Neural Networkscited by 36
  9. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Camera Pose Estimation from Points and Linescited by 16
  10. 2021The Box Size Confidence Bias Harms Your Object Detectorcited by 5
  11. 2024Probabilistic Parameter Estimators and Calibration Metrics for Pose Estimation from Image Featurescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.