From Tokens to Watt-hours: Analytical Energy Estimation for LLM Inference on Modern GPUs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The operational energy consumption of large language model (LLM) inference is becoming an increasingly important component of the environmental footprint of deployed AI systems. However, direct measurement of inference energy often requires hardware telemetry, power instrumentation, or infrastructure-specific monitoring, limiting its applicability in comparative studies, early-stage system design, and sustainability reporting. This report presents an analytically structured, empirically calibrated, GPU-level methodology for estimating LLM inference energy on NVIDIA H100-class accelerators without direct runtime measurement. The proposed estimator combines parameter-scaled transformer FLOP accounting, calibrated memory-traffic factors, and hardware-specific energy coefficients for FP16/BF16 tensor-core computation and high-bandwidth-memory movement. It explicitly separates prompt prefill from autoregressive decoding, enabling energy estimates for input tokens, output tokens, and complete inference requests. The methodology further decomposes total energy into compute, parameter-access, key-value-cache write, and attention-read components, allowing the scaling behavior with model size, context length, and generated-token count to be analyzed. The resulting estimates are not intended to replace physical power measurements; rather, they provide transparent, reproducible, and assumption-explicit approximations suitable for model comparison, green-coding analysis, and design-time evaluation of LLM inference workloads.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 25 references.
References · 14
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
- 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 168
- 2025Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency Optimizationscited by 54
- 2024LLMCO2: Advancing Accurate Carbon Footprint Prediction for LLM Inferencescited by 19
- 2025From Prompts to Power: Measuring the Energy Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 12
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026TokenPowerSandbox: Evidence-Gated CPU-First Screening for Energy-Aware LLM Servingcited by 0
- 2026Analytical Power-Aware Provisioning for Prefill-Decode Disaggregated AI Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Greenpixie's AI Token Methodology: Assessing the Energy, Water and CO2-eq Impact of AI Tokens for Open and Closed Weight Modelscited by 0
- 2026Greenpixie's AI Token Methodology: Assessing the Energy, Water and CO2-eq Impact of AI Tokens for Open and Closed Weight Models27 Sep 2026
- 2026Analytical Power-Aware Provisioning for Prefill-Decode Disaggregated AI Inference21 Sep 2026
- 2026TokenPowerSandbox: Evidence-Gated CPU-First Screening for Energy-Aware LLM Serving11 Aug 2026