mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-Steer: Action-Value Guidance for Molecular Policy Optimization

arXiv 2607.26391 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.LG q-bio.BMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Oracle-limited molecular optimization gives reward only after a complete molecule is generated, while each rollout requires many local next-token decisions. This delayed-feedback interface makes molecular policy optimization myopic: an optimizer can learn that a molecule was good without knowing which intermediate actions made it good. We introduce Q-Steer, a rollout-time action-value steering primitive for molecular language models. Q-Steer uses an offline-trained and frozen prefix-action value scorer, PAVS-Q, that estimates the downstream reward of taking a candidate next token under a partial SMILES prefix, then adds a normalized value bonus to sampling logits. The optimizer update rule and online oracle budget are unchanged; the claim is fixed-online-oracle performance, not equal total compute. On PMO23 with a fixed 10,000-call online budget, complete factorial studies across two molecular language-model backbones and four optimizers show that Q-Steer improves mean valid-unique score in all eight backbone-optimizer cells, with positive macro mean-score gains between +0.033 and +0.049 and 18-20 task wins per cell. Mechanism controls show that action identity matters: prefix-broadcast values are nearly neutral, while shuffled action values harm performance. These results support Q-Steer as a reusable rollout-time action-value wrapper that improves average molecular optimization reward across optimizer families and policy backbones without changing the online oracle budget.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 11 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  3. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  4. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  5. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
  6. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  7. 2018GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for De Novo Molecular Designcited by 297
  8. 2017Molecular De Novo Design through Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  9. 2022Sample Efficiency Matters: A Benchmark for Practical Molecular Optimizationcited by 155
  10. 2020Learning To Navigate The Synthetically Accessible Chemical Space Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 57

Built on by

Not cited yet.