mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Between Gradient and Natural Gradient: A Continuum of LoRA Initializations

arXiv 2607.26247 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large pretrained models at a fraction of the cost of full fine-tuning, but its performance depends strongly on how the adapters are initialized. Recent schemes initialize the adapters from the downstream loss gradient: some project the raw gradient onto its top directions, while others first whiten it with an estimate of the loss curvature. We show that these seemingly distinct methods are points on a single continuum: a two-parameter family of preconditioned gradient initializations, which we call Unified LoRA (ULoRA), governed by a spectral whitening exponent and an Adam-like diagonal exponent. Sweeping this family under a full learning-rate search, we find that no single fixed preconditioning strength dominates: the best operating point is task-dependent and frequently lies strictly inside the family, away from the published endpoints. Treated as an upper bound of this family, a tuned ULoRA configuration matches or exceeds full fine-tuning on all five GLUE tasks with RoBERTa-base and is competitive with the strongest baselines on GSM8K with LLaMA-2-7B. Our deployable, search-free variant, ULoRA-Auto, selects per-layer exponents from measured spectral statistics, approaches this upper bound at no additional search cost, and ranks at or near the top among deployable LoRA methods. Our results show that a principled design space for LoRA initialization and curvature preconditioning should be treated as a tunable dimension rather than a fixed design decision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  9. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  10. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  11. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
  12. 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 365
6 more
  1. 2023Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instructcited by 251
  2. 2023A Rank Stabilization Scaling Factor for Fine-Tuning with LoRAcited by 231
  3. 2024LoRA-GA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Gradient Approximationcited by 134
  4. 2025LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and Efficientlycited by 35
  5. 2024Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning via Explained Variance Adaptationcited by 17
  6. 2026Curvature-Guided LoRA: Matching Full Fine-Tuning in Function Spacecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.