mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Shape-Based Inductive Bias for Glioma Grading from Tumor Contours

arXiv 2607.26090 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Glioma grading from tumor contours is often treated as a pixel problem even when the signal of interest is shape. We align closed contours with a functional shape-alignment framework, separate global deformation from residual Fourier shape, and organize these quantities as frequency-ordered tokens. In five-fold patient-disjoint cross-validation on BraTS~2020 tumor contours, with model selection performed using grouped inner validation, a compact multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieves the highest mean balanced accuracy at 71.5%, compared with 65.9% for ResNet-18 and 63.3% for ViT-Tiny. It also gives the highest mean low-grade glioma F1 at 54.9%. Its pooled out-of-fold balanced accuracy is 72.4% (patient-bootstrap 95% CI: 66.4--77.8%). The selected MLPs use 2.9k--117.3k parameters across folds, at least 46 times fewer than the pixel baselines. In a controlled noise-free simulation, shape-based models reach 56.3--71.5% balanced accuracy while the pixel models remain at 50.0--52.5%. This work demonstrates how incorporating a shape-based inductive bias at the representation level can improve interpretability and scalability while enabling substantial dimensionality reduction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  6. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  7. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  8. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  9. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
  10. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 959
  11. 2021Convolutional Neural Networks Are Not Invariant to Translation, but They Can Learn to Becited by 19
  12. 2020Deep Learning with Functional Inputscited by 13
6 more
  1. 2023Convolutional Neural Networks Rarely Learn Shape for Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
  2. 2015Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challengescited by 9
  3. 2024Functional Autoencoder for Smoothing and Representation Learningcited by 6
  4. 2022Neural Networks for Scalar Input and Functional Outputcited by 4
  5. 2025A Functional Approach to Curve Alignment and Shape Analysiscited by 2
  6. 2025Multivariate Planar Curves: A Statistical Framework for Shape Analysis in Imagescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.