mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Collaborative System Failure Prognostics via Federated Longitudinal-Survival Modeling

arXiv 2607.26038 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-to-event modeling provides a systematic framework for estimating time-dependent failure risk, reliability, and remaining useful life (RUL) from longitudinal condition monitoring data. However, applying these models to distributed prognostics remains challenging because sensor trajectories and failure-time records are often stored across organizations or operational sites and cannot be centrally pooled due to privacy or proprietary constraints. Moreover, the classical Cox proportional hazards model relies on a nonseparable partial likelihood involving global risk sets, making direct optimization difficult under standard federated learning protocols. This paper presents a federated longitudinal-survival modeling framework for collaborative system failure prognostics. The proposed framework combines longitudinal sensor representation learning with a client-separable discrete-time hazard objective, enabling multiple clients to collaboratively train a prognostic model without sharing raw sensor measurements or individual failure records. Time-dependent representations extracted from multivariate sensor histories are used to estimate interval-specific failure hazards, reliability curves, and system RUL. Experiments on the four C-MAPSS turbofan engine degradation subsets under simulated decentralized settings demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently improves prognostic performance over isolated local training while maintaining performance comparable to centralized training across heterogeneous operating conditions and failure modes. These results demonstrate the potential of federated longitudinal-survival modeling for collaborative, data-aware condition monitoring and system failure prognostics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 35 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  5. 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 358
  6. 2020Federated Survival Analysis with Discrete-Time Cox Modelscited by 19
  7. 2021Dual Aspect Self-Attention based on Transformer for Remaining Useful Life Predictioncited by 16
  8. 2023A Federated Learning-based Industrial Health Prognostics for Heterogeneous Edge Devices using Matched Feature Extractioncited by 12
  9. 2019Variational Inference of Joint Models using Multivariate Gaussian Convolution Processescited by 4
  10. 2022A Federated Cox Model with Non-Proportional Hazardscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.