mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contextual Deconvolution for Variance-Stable Demand Sensing: Kernel-Modulated Operators in Promotional Retail

arXiv 2607.25664 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2026cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning demand forecasts optimize statistical accuracy yet leave excess operational volatility that inflates safety stock and amplifies the Bullwhip effect. We introduce Contextual Deconvolution (CD), a two-stage estimator that reframes demand sensing as a convex decomposition: a kernel-modulated banded operator separates transient promotion-driven shocks from a smooth structural baseline, and hierarchical partial pooling enables catalog-scale deployment without per-SKU training. The operator is data-derived, not imposed---it reduces to the identity wherever the promotional response is impulsive (most of M5, all of Favorita) and contributes only where genuine multi-day carryover exists, so the gains rest on the structural decomposition itself. Evaluating strictly out-of-sample on 30,490 M5 SKUs and 2,845 Favorita items, with calendar-aware baselines given CD's identical future calendar, we anchor the contribution on a full inventory-cost accounting: CD lowers safety stock, holding cost, and order variance but under-provisions event spikes, reducing total cost only when holding costs exceed ~20% of stockout costs (95% CI [17%,25%]); otherwise it is an operational-stability and inventory-capital layer, not an expected-cost minimizer. Its accuracy contribution is reliability rather than central tendency: across eleven baselines, CD attains the lowest cross-sectional dispersion of per-SKU error and mis-forecasts by more than 200% on 0.8% of SKUs versus 9.9--20.6% for every baseline, ranking first on both in all four M5 draws. Because the Variance Ratio and std-based safety stock are minimized by any sufficiently smooth forecast, we treat them as diagnostics, not objectives. A supporting analysis shows the learned demand operators are non-normal, yet CD's compact parametric kernel matches their operational performance interpretably.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

Builds on

12 of 40 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
  3. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
  4. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
  5. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 744
  6. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 489
  7. 2024TimeMixer: Decomposable Multiscale Mixing for Time Series Forecastingcited by 333
  8. 2022N-HiTS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecastingcited by 146
  9. 2014From Predictive to Prescriptive Analyticscited by 142
  10. 2013Adaptive piecewise polynomial estimation via trend filteringcited by 47
  11. 2016Applying Deep Learning to the Newsvendor Problemcited by 24
  12. 2020Orbit: Probabilistic Forecast with Exponential Smoothingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.