mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inspect India Evals: An Open Benchmarking Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in the Indian Linguistic and Cultural Context

arXiv 2607.25375 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

India is a vast nation of over 1.4 billion people, varied by hundreds of diverse and locally specific traditions and cultures and 22 officially recognized languages. Large language models (LLMs) are now being deployed on a massive scale throughout the mainland as well as in remote villages. However, the common benchmarks - MMLU, BIG-Bench, and TruthfulQA are almost exclusively English- and Western-centric. They do not identify those safety, fairness, and accuracy failures unique to the Indian context. That is the gap Inspect India Evals seeks to fill. It is an open-source framework built on top of UK AISI's Inspect AI platform. It has six benchmarks: Multilingual MMLU across sixteen Indian languages, BharatBBQ (our adaptation of BBQ for Indian social bias), a safety evaluation for Digital Public Infrastructure, a multilingual safety test using harmful prompts in Indian languages, a multi-turn jailbreak resistance test, and an Indian cultural knowledge benchmark scored using LLM-as-judge rubrics. In this study, we tested five open-weight models ranging from 8B to 32B parameters. Sarvam-M 24B and Gemma 2 27B came out on top, both scoring 80% on the composite India Fairness Index, with Sarvam-M even beating larger 32B models on Indian cultural knowledge and DPI safety compliance. All models scored 100% refusal on Multilingual Safety, whereas DPI safety varied from 20% to 100%. The framework is public. It's built to work with the UK AISI registry. Anyone can reproduce or extend this work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 19 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  7. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  8. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  9. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  10. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  11. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  12. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
1 more
  1. 2020XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoningcited by 330

Built on by

Not cited yet.