Bridging Compute- and Data-Optimal Pretraining
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data. We propose Compute-Data (CD) scaling laws, a unified framework that bridges compute-optimal scaling, where data scales freely with compute, and data-optimal scaling, where the corpus is fixed while compute can grow without bound. CD scaling extends classical scaling laws by introducing a token-effectiveness function, η, which quantifies the value of a derived token-produced, for example, through multi-epoch repetition or paraphrasing-relative to a fresh token, ranging from a perfect substitute to having no value. We fit η for two data-expansion strategies, multi-epoch repetition and paraphrasing, across model sizes from 14M to 600M parameters using the Dolma-3 corpus. We find that token effectiveness is far from constant: it depends jointly on model size, the tokens-per-parameter ratio, and the amount of derived data, and it saturates as the corpus is expanded. The functional form of η implies diminishing returns when substituting compute for data as either model size or data availability increases. It also partitions training into three operational regimes---compute-bound, data-bound, and model-bound---and shows that classical compute-optimal allocation is suboptimal across most practically relevant settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.
Builds on
27 of 30 references.
References · 27
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
15 more
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
- 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 179
- 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 172
- 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161
- 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 156
- 2024Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attemptcited by 65
- 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfallscited by 24
- 2025BeyondWeb: Lessons from Scaling Synthetic Data for Trillion-scale Pretrainingcited by 19
- 2025Improving the Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data with Deliberate Practicecited by 17
- 2026Training Language Models via Neural Cellular Automatacited by 15
- 2025Larger Datasets Can Be Repeated More: A Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Epoch Scaling in Linear Regressioncited by 12
- 2026Prescriptive Scaling Laws for Data Constrained Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Synthetic bootstrapped pretrainingcited by 4
- 2026Domain-Aware Scaling Laws Uncover Data Synergycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.