mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Calibrated Tree-Neural Fusion for Fine-Grained Vegetation Community Classification

arXiv 2607.24160 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes. Existing studies often rely on standalone tree ensembles or generic neural networks, although fine-grained ecological classes frequently exhibit overlapping spectral, topographic, and structural characteristics. Many frameworks also provide limited protection against stacking leakage, insufficient probability calibration, weak minority-class evaluation, and little evidence of stability across repeated data splits. To address these limitations, this study proposes Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a tree-neural probability-fusion framework that combines out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, validation-selected meta-learning, and post-hoc temperature scaling. Raster values from six LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy variables and two hyperspectral vegetation indices were extracted at coordinate-based reference locations. Quality control removed 26 samples with missing elevation and one sample with non-finite NDWI, producing 1,833 complete records across 29 vegetation and non-vegetation classes. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.8000, a macro F1-score of 0.7768, a balanced accuracy of 0.7903, and an MCC of 0.7903. Calibration reduced the expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 without changing class predictions. Five-seed evaluation yielded a macro F1-score of 0.7717 +/- 0.0112, indicating stable performance across repeated splits. The results demonstrate a reliable discrimination-calibration trade-off for small-sample, fine-grained ecological classification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

20 of 72 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  7. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  8. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  9. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
  10. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
  11. 2019Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overviewcited by 123
  12. 2021A Survey: Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification with Few Labeled Samplescited by 22
8 more
  1. 2024LiDAR-Guided Cross-Attention Fusion for Hyperspectral Band Selection and Image Classificationcited by 11
  2. 2020Improvement in Land Cover and Crop Classification based on Temporal Features Learning from Sentinel-2 Data Using Recurrent-Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN)cited by 10
  3. 2021Continental-scale land cover mapping at 10 m resolution over Europe (ELC10)cited by 4
  4. 2023Lidar-based Norwegian tree species detection using deep learningcited by 3
  5. 2024Tree species classification at the pixel-level using deep learning and multispectral time series in an imbalanced contextcited by 3
  6. 2021Hyperspectral and LiDAR data classification based on linear self-attentioncited by 2
  7. 2025HSLiNets: Evaluating Band Ordering Strategies in Hyperspectral and LiDAR Fusioncited by 2
  8. 2024Unsupervised Band Selection Using Fused HSI and LiDAR Attention Integrating With Autoencodercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.