Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Discovering Periodic Orbits in the Gravitational Three-Body Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Locating periodic solutions of chaotic dynamical systems normally requires an initial guess close enough to the target orbit for numerical continuation or gradient-based search to converge. We show that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) trained on sparse, noisy observations without initial conditions recover periodic orbits of the gravitational three-body problem, including orbit families absent from the training data. The method rests on a second-order ODE formulation, fixed-frequency Fourier features, percentile-based adaptive refinement, and a trainable scaling parameter, each validated on forward problems. Across two 100-seed ensembles, 23--25% of runs converge to families not present in the training data. We then ask what determines which family emerges. Two chi2 tests give a consistent answer: changing the training data source significantly shifts the distribution of recovered families (p < 0.001, Cram'er's V = 0.339), whereas switching between the two initialization distributions tested does not (p = 0.620, V = 0.094). The random seed selects which family a given run recovers; the distribution the weights are drawn from does not shift the aggregate frequencies, but the training data does. The evidence is empirical: we do not characterize the loss landscape analytically, and PINNs remain slower than conventional integrators on well-posed initial-value problems. What the experiments establish is that the recovered orbits are verifiable rather than merely plausible: the identified ones refine to genuine periodic solutions, a network trained on Lagrange data recovers the figure-eight choreography (Li--Liao class I.A.1, matched to seven significant digits in T^*), and one trained on figure-eight data recovers a Broucke--Hadjidemetriou--H'enon orbit closing to δT < 10-9.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 29 references.
References · 8
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
- 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
- 2026Comparing Physics-Informed and Neural ODE Approaches for Modeling Nonlinear Biological Systems: A Case Study Based on the Morris-Lecar Modelcited by 3
- 2023A hybrid approach for solving the gravitational N-body problem with Artificial Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025Advancing Solutions for the Three-Body Problem Through Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.