A Statistical Difference between Single-Layer Learning and Hierarchical Learning in Wide Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hierarchical neural networks are widely used in artificial intelligence, yet their mathematical properties remain incompletely understood. In the infinite-width limit, two different theoretical frameworks have been proposed. One reduces deep learning to kernel regression with a fixed kernel by assuming that the parameters remain close to their initialization, whereas the other allows the parameters to move away from their initialization, requiring the kernel itself to be optimized. In this paper, we study a three-layer neural network with a finite but large number of hidden units. We show that training the input-to-hidden weights yields a smaller generalization error than keeping them fixed. Furthermore, the latter setting exhibits singularities in the parameter space, whereas the former does not. These findings indicate that singularities play an essential role even in wide neural networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 24 references.
References · 8
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
- 2019What Can ResNet Learn Efficiently, Going Beyond Kernels?cited by 91
- 2019Limitations of Lazy Training of Two-layers Neural Networkscited by 87
- 2020Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Goodcited by 49
- 2020The Exact Asymptotic Form of Bayesian Generalization Error in Latent Dirichlet Allocationcited by 14
- 2026Upper Bounds for Local Learning Coefficients of Three-Layer Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.