Investigating the Visual Cues of CNNs for Vascular Segmentation: A Case Study in Microscopy and Fundus Imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vascular segmentation is a standard procedure for clinical diagnosis, yet the specific visual features determining model decisions remain poorly understood. This paper investigates the visual cues Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) use to segment blood vessels across two distinct imaging domains: fluorescence microscopy and retinal fundus photography. We employ a series of experiments to quantify the influence of shape, texture, and receptive field on segmentation performance. First, we isolate texture and intensity by evaluating performance on patches subjected to pixel shuffling and normalization. Second, we assess global shape relevance by training models on sparse contours and centerlines. Lastly, we quantify the required spatial context by systematically varying the network's theoretical and effective receptive fields. Within the scope of the evaluated datasets, we found that pixel intensity is more relevant than texture, though networks maintain surprisingly high accuracy even when both cues are removed. Furthermore, CNNs struggle to extrapolate full vessel geometry from shape cues alone, typically relying on a relatively small effective receptive field of around 20 pixels, though global context provides a modest benefit for fundus images. While specific to the modalities studied, this methodology offers a quantitative foundation to audit and refine deep learning systems in vascular imaging.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,666
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2015Holistically-Nested Edge Detectioncited by 592
- 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 551
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 237
- 2020Explainable deep learning models in medical image analysiscited by 111
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
- 2023Convolutional Neural Networks Rarely Learn Shape for Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
- 2024Reducing Texture Bias of Deep Neural Networks via Edge Enhancing Diffusioncited by 11
- 2022Understanding the Influence of Receptive Field and Network Complexity in Neural-Network-Guided TEM Image Analysiscited by 9
4 more
- 2023A new dataset for measuring the performance of blood vessel segmentation methods under distribution shiftscited by 3
- 2024Demystifying the Effect of Receptive Field Size in U-Net Models for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 3
- 2025Shape Bias and Robustness Evaluation via Cue Decomposition for Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 3
- 2025Decomposing and Revising What Language Models Generatecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.