Fair Division with Strictly Increasing Valuations: A Tight Threshold for Two-Agent EF1 and PO
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study whether strictly positive marginal values restore the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) for indivisible goods. For two agents, we identify the exact threshold in the number of goods. Every instance with at most seven goods and strictly increasing valuations admits an allocation that is both EF1 and PO, without any submodularity assumption. In contrast, we construct an eight-good instance with normalized, integer-valued, strictly increasing, submodular valuations in which every EF1 allocation is strictly Pareto dominated. Thus, eight goods are necessary and sufficient for a two-agent counterexample. Finally, we strengthen the three-agent NP-hardness result of Chandramouleeswaran and Nimbhorkar (2026): deciding whether an EF1 and PO allocation exists remains NP-hard for normalized, integer-valued, monotone submodular valuations even when zero marginals are confined to eight fixed agent-good pairs, all involving a single agent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 18 references.
References · 12
- 2017Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuationscited by 22
- 2022Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questionscited by 18
- 2017Finding Fair and Efficient Allocationscited by 9
- 2020Finding Fair and Efficient Allocations When Valuations Don't Add Upcited by 5
- 2020On Approximate Envy-Freeness for Indivisible Chores and Mixed Resourcescited by 3
- 2024Compatibility of Fairness and Nash Welfare under Subadditive Valuationscited by 3
- 2025Existence of Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chorescited by 2
- 2023Fair Distribution of Delivery Orderscited by 1
- 2026The Cost of EFX: Generalized-Mean Welfare and Complexity Dichotomies with Few Surplus Itemscited by 1
- 2026Fair Division with Binary Valuations: Characterizationscited by 1
- 2026When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuationscited by 1
- 2026Nonexistence of Simultaneously EF1 and Pareto Optimal Allocations for Submodular Valuationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.