mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond ICA: Identifiability by Symmetry Breaking

arXiv 2607.23182 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2026stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We prove the identifiability of deep generative models (DGMs) with piecewise-affine (PWA) decoders and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) priors, in a purely unsupervised setting. We introduce three algebraic contrast principles for symmetry breaking: domain contrast, which trivializes the mixture symmetry group; mechanism contrast, which ensures every decoder branch is witnessed by a unique boundary; and interaction contrast, which forbids parameter conspiracies between latent components and decoder branches. Together they exploit the interplay between the discrete combinatorics of the PWA map and the continuous symmetry structure of the latent GMM. Continuity is replaced by algebraic symmetry conditions; injectivity is decoupled from structural identification and required only for pointwise inversion. Our results form a hierarchy: from law identifiability (LID; latent distribution up to a global affine map) through map identifiability (MID; decoder up to the same map) to posterior and pointwise identifiability. The ICA-form ambiguity emerges under conditions on diagonal component covariances. Assumptions are only on the data-generating process, not on learning methods, except for the interaction contrast. To our knowledge this is the first to make algebraic symmetry-breaking the engine of nonlinear identifiability, the first to admit discontinuous decoders, and the first to handle fully non-injective decoders, where every observation admits multiple latent codes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  2. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
  3. 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
  4. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 296
  5. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 273
  6. 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 105
  7. 2021Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?cited by 97
  8. 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
  9. 2022Identifiability of deep generative models without auxiliary informationcited by 70
  10. 2023Additive Decoders for Latent Variables Identification and Cartesian-Product Extrapolationcited by 58
  11. 2018Deep Neural Networks Learn Non-Smooth Functions Effectivelycited by 57
  12. 2022Function Classes for Identifiable Nonlinear Independent Component Analysiscited by 53
9 more
  1. 2023Provably Learning Object-Centric Representationscited by 45
  2. 2023Generalizing Nonlinear ICA Beyond Structural Sparsitycited by 34
  3. 2022Indeterminacy in Generative Models: Characterization and Strong Identifiabilitycited by 33
  4. 2021Properties from Mechanisms: An Equivariance Perspective on Identifiable Representation Learningcited by 30
  5. 2016A State Space Approach for Piecewise-Linear Recurrent Neural Networks for Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamics from Neural Measurementscited by 25
  6. 2024Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable Abstractionscited by 20
  7. 2024Toward the Identifiability of Comparative Deep Generative Modelscited by 4
  8. 2025Mechanistic Independence: A Principle for Identifiable Disentangled Representationscited by 3
  9. 2026Identifiability of Potentially Degenerate Gaussian Mixture Models With Piecewise Affine Mixingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.