mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Structural Preservation Governs Data Augmentation in Deep Learning-Based Laser Speckle Material Classification

arXiv 2607.22725 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation is routinely used to improve generalization in image classification, but the assumptions underlying standard policies are poorly matched to coherent imaging. Laser speckle patterns are not generic textures; they arise from coherent interference, and their discriminative content is carried by structured stochastic spatial and frequency statistics. This study examines how controlled augmentation perturbations influence speckle-based material classification on the SensiCut dataset. We train ResNet18 and EfficientNet-B0 under a parametric augmentation framework comprising rotation, Gaussian blur, independent Gaussian noise, spatially correlated speckle-aware noise, intensity jitter, and spatial masking, and evaluate test performance using macro F1-score averaged over three random seeds. Separate ordinary least squares models link augmentation parameters to performance for each architecture. Across both models, Gaussian blur exerts a strong negative effect (p < 0.001), indicating that low-pass filtering suppresses high-frequency structure that is informative for material discrimination. Independent pixel-wise noise is likewise harmful (p = 0.003 for EfficientNet-B0 and p = 0.001 for ResNet18), consistent with disruption of local spatial coherence. In contrast, spatially correlated perturbations yield significant positive coefficients (p = 0.004 for EfficientNet-B0 and p = 0.001 for ResNet18), showing that variability can improve robustness when it preserves speckle organization. The fitted models explain a substantial fraction of performance variation (R2 = 0.796 for EfficientNet-B0 and R2 = 0.879 for ResNet18). These results show that, in laser speckle imaging, augmentation effectiveness is determined primarily by structural preservation rather than perturbation magnitude. The findings motivate physics-aware augmentation design for coherent optical sensing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 19 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,862
  4. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,238
  5. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  6. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  7. 2025Artificial intelligence approaches for energy-efficient laser cutting machinescited by 2
  8. 2025Towards a Safer and Sustainable Manufacturing Process: Material classification in Laser Cutting Using Deep Learningcited by 1
  9. 2025Efficient Edge-Compatible CNN for Speckle-Based Material Recognition in Laser Cutting Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.