mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

γ-Bridge: A Look-Parametric Diffusion Bridge

arXiv 2607.22719 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiplicative Gamma noise is a signal-dependent degradation in coherent imaging; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) despeckling is its most prominent real-world instance. Existing diffusion denoisers parameterize their forward process by abstract signal-to-noise schedules rather than by the physical look number L, so different deployment scenarios typically require separately trained models, and transfer from synthetic Gamma training to real SAR remains challenging without clean ground truth. We introduce γ-Bridge, a look-parametric bridge whose schedule L(t) connects the noisy observation at Lobs to the clean limit through exact multiplicative Gamma marginals. Its closed-form Gamma--L'evy reverse posterior admits both stochastic and deterministic processes, while observation conditioning and a two-step consistency loss stabilize multi-step inference in the low-SNR single-look regime. Because bridge time directly represents L, one conditioned network can smart-start from any admissible input look and stop at a target look number. These two orthogonal controls enable zero-shot restoration over the full admissible grid after training only at Lobs = 1 on natural images with synthetic Gamma corruption. Combined with a homogeneous-patch look estimator, γ-Bridge processes data from six spaceborne and airborne SAR sensors without sensor-specific fine-tuning, achieving leading results on standard synthetic benchmarks while providing physically interpretable input and output controls absent from prior denoisers. Codes are released hrefhttps://github.com/Teriri1999/GammaBridgehere.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
  2. 2017Deep Image Priorcited by 1,098
  3. 2023Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusioncited by 459
  4. 2023Denoising Diffusion Bridge Modelscited by 178
  5. 2023Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation via Neural Schr"odinger Bridgecited by 96
  6. 2024Diffusion Bridge Implicit Modelscited by 49
  7. 2017SAR image despeckling through convolutional neural networkscited by 30
  8. 2020Speckle2Void: Deep Self-Supervised SAR Despeckling with Blind-Spot Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
  9. 2023Diffusion Model for Generative Image Denoisingcited by 28
  10. 2021Denoising Diffusion Gamma Modelscited by 27
  11. 2017SAR Image Despeckling Using a Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 24
  12. 2022SAR Despeckling using a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelcited by 19
10 more
  1. 2021As if by magic: self-supervised training of deep despeckling networks with MERLINcited by 18
  2. 2022Transformer-based SAR Image Despecklingcited by 15
  3. 2025Residual Diffusion Bridge Model for Image Restorationcited by 15
  4. 2023Star-Shaped Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 13
  5. 2024Generalized Consistency Trajectory Models for Image Manipulationcited by 11
  6. 2023SDDPM: Speckle Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 6
  7. 2024SAR Despeckling via Regional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelcited by 5
  8. 2020Towards Deep Unsupervised SAR Despeckling with Blind-Spot Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
  9. 2024A Tunable Despeckling Neural Network Stabilized via Diffusion Equationcited by 2
  10. 2026Self-Supervised Score-Based Despeckling for SAR Imagery via Log-Domain Transformationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.