mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AIR-BENCH Live: An Evolving Safety Benchmark for Foundation Models

arXiv 2607.22671 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation-model safety benchmarks capture the AI risks of their time of publication: as models improve and governments pass new AI-safety legislation, their risk taxonomies become incomprehensive and their attack prompts become ineffective. We present AIR-BENCH Live, a self-evolving successor to AIR-BENCH 2024. An automated update pipeline monitors government regulation and classifies new policies against the current four-tier risk taxonomy, either matching them to existing categories or proposing new granular categories. Then, a multi-agent, persona-driven prompt generation algorithm generates realistic, multilingual prompts with minimal human review, leaving room for improvement with modern jail breaking techniques. This algorithm is used to overhaul legacy prompts and generate prompts for new categories. In our current version, the pipeline has expanded the benchmark from 314 to 335 granular risks, with the 21 new categories drawing from 31 truly novel policy clauses across seven jurisdictions. Evaluating 14 recent models, we find a wide safety spread (from 0.17 to 0.89 among the models judged on their own behavior), that the modernized prompts are on average 0.06 points harder than the 2024 set, with the largest drops concentrated among the most compliant models, and that most models are modestly less safe on non-English prompts. By continuously absorbing new regulation and regenerating prompts, AIR-BENCH Live is designed to evolve alongside a fast-moving field.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 10 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  2. 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 460
  3. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
  4. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  5. 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 189
  6. 2024JailbreakRadar: Comprehensive Assessment of Jailbreak Attacks Against LLMscited by 87
  7. 2024AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policiescited by 69
  8. 2024Efficient Lifelong Model Evaluation in an Era of Rapid Progresscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.