Beyond Negative-Ridge Endpoints: Mixed-Sign Spectral Regularization via Negative-Shifted Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In overparameterized linear regression, many weak spectral directions act like a ridge penalty on the signal-bearing spectrum; negative ridge is the natural correction, pushing filters above one. The stable negative-ridge endpoint, however, is structurally limited: its pole must stay below the smallest nonzero empirical eigenvalue, and it anti-shrinks smaller eigenvalues more than larger ones. Early-stopped negative-shifted gradient descent escapes this constraint. Its filter is smooth at the would-be pole and mixed-sign-capable: above-ridgeless directions form a leading prefix, with lower directions shrunk or exposure-controlled while stopping sets the crossover. In a Gaussian spike-plus-flat model we discover a Marchenko-Pastur barrier: the shift that cancels the implicit penalty lies a bulk width above the smallest empirical eigenvalue, and the stopped path improves on every admissible endpoint by a polynomial factor in risk under explicit conditions. Our main theorem permits a general high-effective-rank tail: its trace sets the implicit floor, its squared spectrum controls exposure, and the floor-critical path recovers all head scales at once, beyond positive shrinkage and, once scales separate, every uniform rescaling of ridgeless. Handling the noncontractive shifted dynamics is the central technical challenge; localized Duhamel integrals control them. A finite-grid hold-out inequality transfers the separations to the validation-selected algorithm.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2020Benign overfitting in ridge regressioncited by 152
- 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 146
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
- 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 97
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
- 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 67
- 2020Asymptotics of Ridge (less) Regression under General Source Conditioncited by 61
- 2020The Implicit Regularization of Stochastic Gradient Flow for Least Squarescited by 58
- 2018Optimal ridge penalty for real-world high-dimensional data can be zero or negative due to the implicit ridge regularizationcited by 52
10 more
- 2022Dimension free ridge regressioncited by 50
- 2021SGD in the Large: Average-case Analysis, Asymptotics, and Stepsize Criticalitycited by 33
- 2021The Benefits of Implicit Regularization from SGD in Least Squares Problemscited by 32
- 2022Homogenization of SGD in high-dimensions: Exact dynamics and generalization propertiescited by 26
- 2023Generalized equivalences between subsampling and ridge regularizationcited by 10
- 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regressioncited by 10
- 2025Risk Comparisons in Linear Regression: Implicit Regularization Dominates Explicit Regularizationcited by 7
- 2025Two-Point Deterministic Equivalence for Stochastic Gradient Dynamics in Linear Modelscited by 6
- 2024Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descentcited by 4
- 2025Comparing regularisation paths of (conjugate) gradient estimators in ridge regressioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.