Interior interpretability with attention rollout: contraction and propagation profiles in Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature-attribution methods assign scores relating input variables to a model's output, but do not by themselves characterize how explicitly defined interaction operators compose across its intermediate layers. We introduce interior interpretability, a propagation-based perspective on internal model organization, and instantiate it for tabular Transformers using attention rollout. We interpret rollout as a row-stochastic operator encoding attention-mediated propagation between feature tokens. By applying classical Doeblin--Dobrushin contraction theory, we show that a rollout operator with a small Dobrushin coefficient is quantitatively close to a rank-one stochastic matrix whose common row is determined by its normalized column sums. This result gives a structural interpretation to the corresponding rollout propagation profile. In Transformers trained for metabolomic age prediction, the measured rollout contraction strengthens with depth. Trained and randomly initialized models also exhibit different propagation profiles, although the present experiments do not establish the predictive relevance of individual rollout-ranked variables. Exploratory comparisons with PCA and GradientExplainer approximations to SHAP reveal localized agreement among highly ranked variables but weak agreement across complete rankings. Attention rollout is therefore used here as a diagnostic of attention-mediated propagation, not as a causal explanation or faithful attribution of the complete Transformer.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
19 of 41 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 411
7 more
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2023A mathematical perspective on Transformerscited by 160
- 2023The emergence of clusters in self-attention dynamicscited by 133
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 126
- 2024Clustering in pure-attention hardmax transformers and its role in sentiment analysiscited by 15
- 2026Perceptrons and localization of attention's mean-field landscapecited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.