From Perturbation Correction to Geometry-Aware Sampling: Sharpness-Guided Equilibrium Sampling for Balanced Flat Minima in Long-Tailed Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Long-tailed learning couples two sources of poor generalization: head classes dominate training exposure, while under-represented classes often converge to sharper regions of the loss landscape. Conventional re-sampling addresses the former without considering geometry, whereas existing long-tailed sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) methods modify losses or perturbations only after biased mini-batches have been drawn. We introduce Sharpness-Guided Equilibrium Sampling (SGS), which treats the sampling distribution as an active control variable for optimization geometry. SGS dynamically adjusts subsequent mini-batches by increasing the sampling probability of less frequently sampled classes while suppressing classes with large SAM-induced loss changes, using only cumulative class counts and EMA sharpness estimates obtained from the standard SAM update, without class-wise perturbations or additional backward passes. We characterize this sampling process through a continuous-time stochastic differential equation and a sampling-dependent PAC-Bayes analysis, explaining how frequency-sharpness feedback can move training toward a more balanced flatness profile. On CIFAR-100 LT with an imbalance ratio of 100, SGS-SAM improves Focal-SAM by 10.85 points in tail accuracy and 3.56 points overall. On ImageNet-LT, it improves ImbSAM by 6.59 points on tail classes and 1.20 points overall. Its training time is only 1.02× that of vanilla SAM. Beyond these gains, SGS establishes a sampling-side route to loss-landscape control, suggesting that future long-tailed methods can jointly regulate data exposure and optimization geometry rather than treating either as fixed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
- 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
- 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
- 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
- 2022InternImage: Exploring Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models with Deformable Convolutionscited by 479
- 2020Balanced Meta-Softmax for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 397
- 2021Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 217
5 more
- 2021Improving Calibration for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 212
- 2020The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 108
- 2023Long-Tail Learning with Foundation Model: Heavy Fine-Tuning Hurtscited by 58
- 2023ImbSAM: A Closer Look at Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Class-Imbalanced Recognitioncited by 31
- 2025Focal-SAM: Focal Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Long-Tailed Classificationcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.