mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Defining AI-Native Systems: Autonomy as Revision Authority

arXiv 2607.21659 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.OScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI has begun to write systems code: agents now synthesize, verify, and deploy system components. Despite this shift, "AI-native" remains a marketing term with no precise technical definition. This paper gives it one. We define AI-nativeness along a single axis---authority over the system's own decisions rather than by the capability of the underlying AI models. Building on a decision-level model of a system, we distinguish occupancy (who executes a decision) from revision authority (who may change it), organize revision authority into a ladder---self-tuning, self-rewriting, self-architecting and define a system as AI-native when an AI autonomously rewrites the system's own implementations. The definition further requires an escalation detector, a verification procedure, and a verified fallback, while leaving purpose and correctness human-owned.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 26 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGIcited by 96
  2. 2025Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Researchcited by 54
  3. 2021A Survey of Machine Learning for Computer Architecture and Systemscited by 53
  4. 2025Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developedcited by 45
  5. 2017Why (and How) Networks Should Run Themselvescited by 13
  6. 2025Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Researchcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.