Defining AI-Native Systems: Autonomy as Revision Authority
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI has begun to write systems code: agents now synthesize, verify, and deploy system components. Despite this shift, "AI-native" remains a marketing term with no precise technical definition. This paper gives it one. We define AI-nativeness along a single axis---authority over the system's own decisions rather than by the capability of the underlying AI models. Building on a decision-level model of a system, we distinguish occupancy (who executes a decision) from revision authority (who may change it), organize revision authority into a ladder---self-tuning, self-rewriting, self-architecting and define a system as AI-native when an AI autonomously rewrites the system's own implementations. The definition further requires an escalation detector, a verification procedure, and a verified fallback, while leaving purpose and correctness human-owned.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2023Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGIcited by 96
- 2025Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Researchcited by 54
- 2021A Survey of Machine Learning for Computer Architecture and Systemscited by 53
- 2025Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developedcited by 45
- 2017Why (and How) Networks Should Run Themselvescited by 13
- 2025Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Researchcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.