mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Privacy-Preserving Federated Prompt Tuning under Data Heterogeneity: A Subspace-Decomposed Expert Approach

arXiv 2607.21417 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated prompt tuning (FPT) enables collaborative adaptation of vision--language models (VLMs) using lightweight prompts. Existing methods often address heterogeneity and privacy through a split-prompt design under local differential privacy (DP), combining a shared prompt for global transfer with private prompts for local adaptation. However, a single shared prompt may over-smooth diverse transferable knowledge, weakening the balance between personalization and generalization. Multi-expert prompts (MEPs) can better capture this diversity, but enlarge the communicated space, increasing DP noise and communication cost while making robust expert composition more difficult. We propose FedSEPT, a privacy-preserving Fed}erated Subspace-decomposed Expert Prompt Tuning. Specifically, we employ Subspace-decomposed Expert Modeling (SEM) to parameterize multiple prompt experts with shared low-rank factors, a fixed public basis, and private residuals, thereby confining communication and DP perturbation to a compact factor space while enabling direct server aggregation in a common coordinate system. We further design Instance-aware Expert Fusion (IEF), which adaptively combines semantically complementary experts via on-device routing and performs efficient logit-level fusion using cached expert-specific text features. Extensive experiments on 11 heterogeneous benchmarks show that, under the same privacy constraints, FedSEPT achieves a better trade-off between local adaptation and global generalization than strong baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

25 of 45 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  5. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  8. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  9. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
  10. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  11. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  12. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimizationcited by 308
13 more
  1. 2022PromptFL: Let Federated Participants Cooperatively Learn Prompts Instead of Models -- Federated Learning in Age of Foundation Modelcited by 134
  2. 2022FedPrompt: Communication-Efficient and Privacy Preserving Prompt Tuning in Federated Learningcited by 91
  3. 2020Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identificationcited by 90
  4. 2023Efficient Model Personalization in Federated Learning via Client-Specific Prompt Generationcited by 54
  5. 2024Global and Local Prompts Cooperation via Optimal Transport for Federated Learningcited by 46
  6. 2024DiPrompT: Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Multiple Latent Domain Generalization in Federated Learningcited by 32
  7. 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 31
  8. 2024Harmonizing Generalization and Personalization in Federated Prompt Learningcited by 27
  9. 2023Experts Weights Averaging: A New General Training Scheme for Vision Transformerscited by 12
  10. 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learningcited by 8
  11. 2025FedDEAP: Adaptive Dual-Prompt Tuning for Multi-Domain Federated Learningcited by 1
  12. 2026Leveraging Soft Prompts for Privacy Attacks in Federated Prompt Tuningcited by 1
  13. 2026Taming Noise-Induced Prototype Degradation for Privacy-Preserving Personalized Federated Fine-Tuningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SDFed: Bridging Local Global Discrepancy via Subspace Refinement and Divergence Control in Federated Prompt Learning
  2. 2025Privacy-preserving Prompt Personalization in Federated Learning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2025Privacy-Preserving Personalized Federated Prompt Learning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2024Mixture of Experts Made Personalized: Federated Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Replacing Parameters with Preferences: Federated Alignment of Heterogeneous Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025An Empirical Study of Federated Prompt Learning for Vision Language Model
  7. 2025FedVLMBench: Benchmarking Federated Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Replacing Parameters with Preferences: Federated Alignment of Heterogeneous Vision-Language Models