A Unified Moral-Value Dataset for Instruction Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have developed rapidly and become valuable tools in everyday life. However, how to align LLMs to a particular set of human values is still an open problem. Recent studies show that instruction tuning has strong potential for zero-shot tasks and may serve as an effective approach to addressing value alignment. Nevertheless, although many datasets for instruction tuning already exist, they are not specifically designed around moral scenarios and behaviors. We construct a unified moral-value dataset that can be directly used for instruction tuning. This dataset is built upon existing moral-value datasets by merging them into a unified corpus and converting them into an instruction-response format. We show that training on a mixed dataset combining general task datasets with our dataset preserves general-task performance, and we report preliminary observations on how the mixing ratio affects value-oriented task performance. Our work provides a moral-value dataset for instruction tuning and offers a useful resource for further alignment research. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/teohzzh/value-for-instruction-tuning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.
Builds on
23 of 34 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
11 more
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 527
- 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 253
- 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 100
- 2021Deep Neural Networks for Rank-Consistent Ordinal Regression Based On Conditional Probabilitiescited by 57
- 2025Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?cited by 49
- 2022Self-Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Open-Domain QAcited by 39
- 2025Are Rules Meant to be Broken? Understanding Multilingual Moral Reasoning as a Computational Pipeline with UniMoralcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.