mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Progressive Cramming: Reliable Token Compression and What It Reveals

arXiv 2607.21231 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Visual token pruning in multimodal models

Abstract (arXiv)

Token cramming compresses sequences into learned embeddings with near-perfect reconstruction, but fixed token budgets and 99% accuracy thresholds leave it unclear whether residual errors reflect optimization failures or fundamental limits. We introduce progressive cramming, which grows the target prefix token-by-token, stopping only when reconstruction is no longer achievable within a fixed optimization budget. Progressive trajectories occupy low-dimensional structure in embedding space. Prepending a crammed embedding causes a moderate but consistent accuracy drop on multiple-choice benchmarks even with the original prefix in context, and collapses capability almost entirely under generative evaluation. Causal attention-knockout interventions trace this degradation to the embedding's interactions in the model's early layers. These results position progressive cramming as a tool for studying compression limits and show that perfect reconstruction - achievable through brittle steering rather than transferable semantics - is insufficient for meaningful compression.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning in multimodal models, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 11 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Cramming 1568 Tokens into a Single Vector and Back Again: Exploring the Limits of Embedding Space Capacity18 Feb

Other references · 9

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  3. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  4. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  5. 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 726
  6. 2023Adapting Language Models to Compress Contextscited by 356
  7. 2023In-context Autoencoder for Context Compression in a Large Language Modelcited by 199
  8. 2024Long Context Compression with Activation Beaconcited by 104
  9. 2025Exploring the Hidden Capacity of LLMs for One-Step Text Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022CrAM: A Compression-Aware Minimizer
  2. 2026Beyond Selection: Token Parameterization for Extreme Visual Token Compression
  3. 2026FastE: Readout-Triggered Token Compression for LLM Embedding Inference
  4. 2025TokenCarve: Information-Preserving Visual Token Compression in Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2026SemanticFold: Latent Sequence Compression SeparatesLanguage Modeling, Decodability, and Reasoning
  6. 2026Just Respect the Semantics: Image-Token Compression via Pre-LLM Semantic Variable-Resolution Tokenization and In-LLM Relevance Pruning
  7. 2026LRCP: Low-Rank Compressibility Guided Visual Token Pruning for Efficient LVLMs
  8. 2025Are We Using the Right Benchmark: An Evaluation Framework for Visual Token Compression Methods