Break Through the Compression Bottleneck: From Theory to Practice
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the parameter size of language models continues to grow, effective model compression is required to reduce their computational and memory overhead. Existing compression methods suffer from bottleneck issues: when the compression ratio is increased, performance degrades significantly. Low-rank decomposition and quantization are two prominent compression methods that have been proven to significantly reduce the computational and memory requirements of Large Language Models (LLMs) while maintaining model accuracy. Evidently, combining these two methods will break through the existing compression bottleneck. However, how these two methods interact when combined remains a critical question for developers, as many assume they are orthogonal, meaning their combination would not introduce additional errors beyond those independently introduced by each method. This paper provides the first mathematical proof that low-rank decomposition and quantization are non-orthogonal. We validate these findings through a series of experiments on large language models. Our results demonstrate that these methods are non-orthogonal, and their combination leads to significant performance degradation. Importantly, we propose a novel approach Diagonal Adhesive Method (DAM), which can effectively combine the two methods and mitigate the performance loss. Our research provides deep insights into model compression and lays a solid theoretical and experimental foundation for future related studies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,838
- 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
- 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 598
- 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 446
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
- 2023QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guaranteescited by 397
7 more
- 2024QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebookscited by 354
- 2024SVD-LLM: Truncation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 231
- 2022Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorizationcited by 192
- 2025OstQuant: Refining Large Language Model Quantization with Orthogonal and Scaling Transformations for Better Distribution Fittingcited by 94
- 2018A Systematic Classification of Knowledge, Reasoning, and Context within the ARC Datasetcited by 54
- 2023Editing Common Sense in Transformerscited by 28
- 2021Modeling Event Plausibility with Consistent Conceptual Abstractioncited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.