Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods, including prompt engineering and model optimization, either hardly alter models'internal knowledge or have poor cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding mitigates hallucinations by using layer-wise differences in LLMs. However, prior studies only explore transformer-based models (e.g., GPT), ignoring other effective frameworks like mixture-of-experts (MoE) models. Since MoE alters the traditional transformer architecture, we conduct empirical studies to investigate whether similar layer-wise differences exist in MoEs. Our results show that they do not exist in MoE with shared experts; nevertheless, across different MoEs, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. Building on these, we propose EAACD, an expert-aware adaptive contrast decoding that uses expert differences in MoE's higher layers to mitigate hallucinations on QA tasks. EAACD splits high-layer experts into a higher-reliability group and several lower-reliability groups based on their confidence and consistency. It contrasts the higher-reliability group's prediction with each lower-reliability group's prediction to calibrate the model's original predictions. To strengthen this contrast, EAACD amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts via attention and masking to provide stronger negative references. EAACD outperforms all baselines on four datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 31 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
31 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024CartesianMoE: Boosting Knowledge Sharing among Experts via Cartesian Product Routing in Mixture-of-Experts21 Oct
- 2024A Closer Look into Mixture-of-Experts in Large Language Models26 Jun
- 2024LLaMA-MoE: Building Mixture-of-Experts from LLaMA with Continual Pre-training24 Jun
- 2024XMoE: Sparse Models with Fine-grained and Adaptive Expert Selection27 Feb
- 2024HyperMoE: Towards Better Mixture of Experts via Transferring Among Experts20 Feb
Other references · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2023Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?cited by 285
14 more
- 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 260
- 2024Uni-MoE: Scaling Unified Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Expertscited by 108
- 2023Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 105
- 2023Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflectioncited by 81
- 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 79
- 2024KAM-CoT: Knowledge Augmented Multimodal Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoningcited by 60
- 2023The Benefits of Bad Advice: Autocontrastive Decoding across Model Layerscited by 29
- 2024Unchosen Experts Can Contribute Too: Unleashing MoE Models' Power by Self-Contrastcited by 19
- 2024Improving Factuality in Large Language Models via Decoding-Time Hallucinatory and Truthful Comparatorscited by 19
- 2023A Frustratingly Simple Decoding Method for Neural Text Generationcited by 16
- 2023Exploiting Activation Sparsity with Dense to Dynamic-k Mixture-of-Experts Conversioncited by 16
- 2024Zero-resource Hallucination Detection for Text Generation via Graph-based Contextual Knowledge Triples Modelingcited by 9
- 2025Inv-Entropy: A Fully Probabilistic Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in LM-Based TTS Models via Distribution Alignment Using GFlowNetscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SAKED: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Stability-Aware Knowledge Enhanced Decoding
- 2024CATCH: Complementary Adaptive Token-level Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Hallucinations in LVLMs
- 2024Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
- 2025The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs?
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Internal Fact-based Contrastive Decoding
- 2024VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding
- 2025Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal LLMs with Layer Contrastive Decoding
- 2026HIME: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Hallucination Insensitivity Model Editing