mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations

arXiv 2607.20426 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods, including prompt engineering and model optimization, either hardly alter models'internal knowledge or have poor cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding mitigates hallucinations by using layer-wise differences in LLMs. However, prior studies only explore transformer-based models (e.g., GPT), ignoring other effective frameworks like mixture-of-experts (MoE) models. Since MoE alters the traditional transformer architecture, we conduct empirical studies to investigate whether similar layer-wise differences exist in MoEs. Our results show that they do not exist in MoE with shared experts; nevertheless, across different MoEs, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. Building on these, we propose EAACD, an expert-aware adaptive contrast decoding that uses expert differences in MoE's higher layers to mitigate hallucinations on QA tasks. EAACD splits high-layer experts into a higher-reliability group and several lower-reliability groups based on their confidence and consistency. It contrasts the higher-reliability group's prediction with each lower-reliability group's prediction to calibrate the model's original predictions. To strengthen this contrast, EAACD amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts via attention and masking to provide stronger negative references. EAACD outperforms all baselines on four datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 31 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024CartesianMoE: Boosting Knowledge Sharing among Experts via Cartesian Product Routing in Mixture-of-Experts21 Oct
  2. 2024A Closer Look into Mixture-of-Experts in Large Language Models26 Jun
  3. 2024LLaMA-MoE: Building Mixture-of-Experts from LLaMA with Continual Pre-training24 Jun
  4. 2024XMoE: Sparse Models with Fine-grained and Adaptive Expert Selection27 Feb
  5. 2024HyperMoE: Towards Better Mixture of Experts via Transferring Among Experts20 Feb

Other references · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  4. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  6. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  7. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
  8. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  9. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  10. 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
  11. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
  12. 2023Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?cited by 285
14 more
  1. 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 260
  2. 2024Uni-MoE: Scaling Unified Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Expertscited by 108
  3. 2023Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 105
  4. 2023Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflectioncited by 81
  5. 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 79
  6. 2024KAM-CoT: Knowledge Augmented Multimodal Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoningcited by 60
  7. 2023The Benefits of Bad Advice: Autocontrastive Decoding across Model Layerscited by 29
  8. 2024Unchosen Experts Can Contribute Too: Unleashing MoE Models' Power by Self-Contrastcited by 19
  9. 2024Improving Factuality in Large Language Models via Decoding-Time Hallucinatory and Truthful Comparatorscited by 19
  10. 2023A Frustratingly Simple Decoding Method for Neural Text Generationcited by 16
  11. 2023Exploiting Activation Sparsity with Dense to Dynamic-k Mixture-of-Experts Conversioncited by 16
  12. 2024Zero-resource Hallucination Detection for Text Generation via Graph-based Contextual Knowledge Triples Modelingcited by 9
  13. 2025Inv-Entropy: A Fully Probabilistic Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Language Modelscited by 6
  14. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in LM-Based TTS Models via Distribution Alignment Using GFlowNetscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SAKED: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Stability-Aware Knowledge Enhanced Decoding
  2. 2024CATCH: Complementary Adaptive Token-level Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Hallucinations in LVLMs
  3. 2024Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
  4. 2025The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs?
  5. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Internal Fact-based Contrastive Decoding
  6. 2024VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding
  7. 2025Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal LLMs with Layer Contrastive Decoding
  8. 2026HIME: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Hallucination Insensitivity Model Editing