Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization for Strongly Geodesically Convex Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study decentralized online optimization for strongly geodesically convex (strongly g-convex) losses on Riemannian manifolds with bounded sectional curvature, including positively curved manifolds. In centralized Riemannian optimization, strong g-convexity tightens the optimal regret from O(√T) to O(log T), where T is the time horizon; in the decentralized Riemannian setting, however, existing methods address only g-convex losses, leaving the strongly g-convex regime unexplored. One challenge is that the required decaying step size in the centralized regime is incompatible with existing network-error analyses, which typically assume a fixed step size. First, we provide a general network-error analysis for time-varying schedules. Next, we build on this analysis to establish the first O(log T) static regret bound for decentralized online Riemannian gradient descent, matching the minimax-optimal rate for strongly-convex Euclidean online optimization. Finally, we prove the same O(log T) regret bound for the two-point bandit feedback setting using novel strong subconvexity arguments for the smoothed versions of the loss functions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2015Online Optimization : Competing with Dynamic Comparatorscited by 99
- 2016First-order Methods for Geodesically Convex Optimizationcited by 93
- 2019Escaping from saddle points on Riemannian manifoldscited by 33
- 2021Decentralized Riemannian Gradient Descent on the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 33
- 2016Distributed Online Optimization in Dynamic Environments Using Mirror Descentcited by 32
- 2019A Continuous-time Perspective for Modeling Acceleration in Riemannian Optimizationcited by 25
- 2014Online Distributed Optimization on Dynamic Networkscited by 15
- 2020Tracking and regret bounds for online zeroth-order Euclidean and Riemannian optimisationcited by 12
- 2020Global Riemannian Acceleration in Hyperbolic and Spherical Spacescited by 10
- 2022Accelerated Gradient Methods for Geodesically Convex Optimization: Tractable Algorithms and Convergence Analysiscited by 10
- 2023Decentralized projected Riemannian gradient method for smooth optimization on compact submanifoldscited by 9
- 2021A Linearly Convergent Algorithm for Distributed Principal Component Analysiscited by 8
12 more
- 2021On the Local Linear Rate of Consensus on the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 8
- 2016Rapid Mixing of Geodesic Walks on Manifolds with Positive Curvaturecited by 7
- 2024Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization with Dynamic Environmentscited by 5
- 2023Riemannian Projection-free Online Learningcited by 4
- 2025Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization Beyond Hadamard Manifoldscited by 4
- 2022Distributed Riemannian Optimization with Lazy Communication for Collaborative Geometric Estimationcited by 3
- 2024Riemannian Optimization for Active Mapping with Robot Teamscited by 3
- 2025Online Optimization on Hadamard Manifolds: Curvature Independent Regret Bounds on Horospherically Convex Objectivescited by 3
- 2025Finite-Time Analysis of Stochastic Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization on the Riemannian Manifoldscited by 2
- 2025Decentralized Optimization on Compact Submanifolds by Quantized Riemannian Gradient Trackingcited by 1
- 2025Distributed Riemannian Optimization in Geodesically Non-convex Environmentscited by 1
- 2026Intrinsic Decentralized Stochastic Riemannian Optimization on Manifolds with Bounded Sectional Curvaturecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.