mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting Groundwater Arsenic Concentrations Using Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2607.19392 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Arsenic contamination in groundwater presents a longstanding public health crisis in the United States, especially for households depending on private wells. Accurate and spatially informed prediction of arsenic concentration is vital to identify high-risk areas and focus mitigation efforts. However, there is a lack of generalizable models for representing continuous variation in arsenic concentrations across regions. In this work, we pose arsenic prediction as a regression task and construct a spatially integrated dataset to aggregate over 74,000 arsenic samples from the Water Quality Portal (WQP), Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS), and Gridded National Soil Survey Geographic Database (gNATSGO). Specifically, we use a variety of techniques including kNearest Neighbors (k-NN) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to join arsenic measurement points from across the United States by location. Building on this dataset, we evaluate a diverse suite of machine learning models, including tree-based ensemble approaches, multilayer perceptrons, and spatially aware graph neural networks (GNN). Our findings show that while gradient-boosted trees are still considered state-of-the-art in the field of tabular data, GNNs are able to further account for spatial dependence to match or outperform the results of gradient-boosted trees. These results demonstrate that graph-based and spatially informed learning can enhance environmental prediction and provide a foundation for improved groundwater risk mapping and monitoring.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

7 of 20 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  5. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  7. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877

Built on by

Not cited yet.