Euclean: Automated Geometry Problem Formalization with Unified Verification in Lean
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent formal reasoning systems have reached IMO-level performance, yet they leave a fragmented landscape: algebra and number theory are handled in Lean, while geometry still relies on domain-specific languages with limited formal guarantees. This split increases the trusted computing base and hinders unified model development. Existing geometry-in-Lean efforts (LeanEuclid, LeanGeo) introduce custom axiom systems incompatible with standard Mathlib, and their small scale (< 1,100 problems) limits large-scale training. Native Mathlib autoformalization of geometry, however, poses distinct challenges: implicit diagrammatic assumptions (e.g., topological configuration and non-degeneracy) must be made explicit rather than deferred to external solvers, and models must adapt to Mathlib's small, rapidly evolving geometry infrastructure. We present Euclean, a four-stage framework - constraint explication, configuration anchoring, formalization mapping, and iterative repair - for automatically formalizing geometry in native Mathlib. We construct OMNI-Geometry (768 competition problems) and Numina-Geometry (177,597 problems), the largest geometry formalization dataset in Lean. Human evaluation shows 48.89% TOP1 and 73.33% TOP5 accuracy. Training Goedel v2 on our formalizations improves proof success from 13.6% to 15.1%, validating dataset quality for unified neural theorem proving. Code and datasets: https://github.com/tlb-22/Euclean.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
9 of 35 references.
References · 9
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 270
- 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 126
- 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 115
- 2024Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometrycited by 27
- 2024Proposing and solving olympiad geometry with guided tree searchcited by 18
- 2025MATP-BENCH: Can MLLM Be a Good Automated Theorem Prover for Multimodal Problems?cited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.