mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Euclean: Automated Geometry Problem Formalization with Unified Verification in Lean

arXiv 2607.19374 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent formal reasoning systems have reached IMO-level performance, yet they leave a fragmented landscape: algebra and number theory are handled in Lean, while geometry still relies on domain-specific languages with limited formal guarantees. This split increases the trusted computing base and hinders unified model development. Existing geometry-in-Lean efforts (LeanEuclid, LeanGeo) introduce custom axiom systems incompatible with standard Mathlib, and their small scale (< 1,100 problems) limits large-scale training. Native Mathlib autoformalization of geometry, however, poses distinct challenges: implicit diagrammatic assumptions (e.g., topological configuration and non-degeneracy) must be made explicit rather than deferred to external solvers, and models must adapt to Mathlib's small, rapidly evolving geometry infrastructure. We present Euclean, a four-stage framework - constraint explication, configuration anchoring, formalization mapping, and iterative repair - for automatically formalizing geometry in native Mathlib. We construct OMNI-Geometry (768 competition problems) and Numina-Geometry (177,597 problems), the largest geometry formalization dataset in Lean. Human evaluation shows 48.89% TOP1 and 73.33% TOP5 accuracy. Training Goedel v2 on our formalizations improves proof success from 13.6% to 15.1%, validating dataset quality for unified neural theorem proving. Code and datasets: https://github.com/tlb-22/Euclean.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

9 of 35 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
  2. 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 277
  3. 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decompositioncited by 270
  4. 2025Kimina-Prover Preview: Towards Large Formal Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  5. 2025Goedel-Prover: A Frontier Model for Open-Source Automated Theorem Provingcited by 126
  6. 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 115
  7. 2024Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometrycited by 27
  8. 2024Proposing and solving olympiad geometry with guided tree searchcited by 18
  9. 2025MATP-BENCH: Can MLLM Be a Good Automated Theorem Prover for Multimodal Problems?cited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.