Beyond Single-Dimensional Compression: The Compound Sparsity Frontier of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are often compressed through static parameter pruning or dynamic token-level computation, yet aggressive sparsification can trigger rapid performance degradation beyond an essential sparsity boundary. This work asks whether combining these two mechanisms can delay such degradation by distributing the compression burden. We study a minimalist compound sparsity framework that first applies low-rank approximation and channel pruning to obtain a statically compressed backbone, and then introduces lightweight routers for per-token dynamic layer skipping. This design enables independent control of parameter sparsity and token-level computation sparsity. Experiments across language understanding and modeling benchmarks show that compound sparsity consistently outperforms single-mechanism compression under the same total sparsity, delaying the decay point on understanding tasks and preserving stronger modeling performance. Further analysis reveals cross-dimensional interference between parameter pruning and token skipping, and shows that near-balanced allocation is most effective under a fixed sparsity budget. These results demonstrate that compound compression provides a practical way to improve LLM compression, while revealing a broader cross-dimensional sparsity boundary that ultimately limits further compression. Code will be available at https://github.com/EIT-NLP/LLM-Pruning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 378
- 2024LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigationcited by 92
- 2024LazyLLM: Dynamic Token Pruning for Efficient Long Context LLM Inferencecited by 70
8 more
- 2023The Emergence of Essential Sparsity in Large Pre-trained Models: The Weights that Mattercited by 42
- 2024Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part Icited by 24
- 2022WeLM: A Well-Read Pre-trained Language Model for Chinesecited by 19
- 2026HiDrop: Hierarchical Vision Token Reduction in MLLMs via Late Injection, Concave Pyramid Pruning, and Early Exitcited by 15
- 2025Determining Layer-wise Sparsity for Large Language Models Through a Theoretical Perspectivecited by 13
- 2026From LLMs to LRMs: Rethinking Pruning for Reasoning-Centric Modelscited by 9
- 2024Change Is the Only Constant: Dynamic LLM Slicing based on Layer Redundancycited by 8
- 2025Informed Routing in LLMs: Smarter Token-Level Computation for Faster Inferencecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.