mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BatchDAG: LLM-Planned Execution Graphs for Scalable Ad-Hoc Analysis Over Enterprise Data

arXiv 2607.18241 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) excel at analyzing individual documents but break down on exhaustive, cross-entity analytical questions over enterprise-scale datasets due to context overflow, loss of per-entity attribution, and linear latency from sequential tool calls. We present BatchDAG, a system in which an LLM generates a typed directed acyclic graph (DAG) of operations -- SQL queries, semantic searches, in-memory transforms, parallel fan-outs, and single-shot analyses -- which a deterministic engine evaluates with topological-wave parallelism and structured JSON data flow. A key optimization, entity-aware batching, groups rows by logical entity before fan-out, reducing LLM calls by up to 47x. BatchDAG is not primarily an accuracy improvement over hand-optimized pipelines; rather, it is a general-purpose orchestration layer that replaces multiple hand-engineered workflows with a single system that generates the appropriate execution strategy from natural language. In controlled experiments on 12 transcript-heavy queries, BatchDAG (3.74/5) achieves quality comparable to an expert-designed pipeline (3.25/5) and significantly outperforms a ReAct agent (3.09/5, p<0.01), with superior provenance (77% transcript evidence rate vs. 46-60% for baselines). A controlled ablation shows structured JSON intermediates reduce hallucinations by 27% versus prose summaries (paired t-test, p=0.107, n=12). The planner achieves 98.8% valid-DAG rate across 300 planning calls. In production at Brevian.ai, BatchDAG processes queries over 50,000+ meetings in under 60 seconds, with measured per-query costs of 0.02-0.24 at published GPT-5.1 pricing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  3. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
  4. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
  5. 2024Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structurescited by 110

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Case for Instance-Optimized LLMs in OLAP Databases
  2. 2025BenchPress: A Human-in-the-Loop Annotation System for Rapid Text-to-SQL Benchmark Curation
  3. 2026GraphSeek: Next-Generation Graph Analytics with LLMs
  4. 2026GROUND: Reducing Hallucinations in LLM-Based Enterprise Analytics Through Governed Semantic Definitions
  5. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQL
  6. 2026GenDB: The Next Generation of Query Processing -- Synthesized, Not Engineered
  7. 2025CoddLLM: Empowering Large Language Models for Data Analytics
  8. 2024Optimizing LLM Queries in Relational Data Analytics Workloads