How Does Alignment Tuning Shape Representations of Sycophancy and Related Cue-Induced Biases in LLMs?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern LLMs are alarmingly susceptible to surprisingly simple immaterial changes of input prompts: a casual hint, an incorrectly labeled few-shot example, or a fake prior assistant turn often flips an originally correct answer. We study where this susceptibility, spanning sycophancy and related cue-induced biases, lives inside the model. Across five model families and seven bias types, we extract a per-bias direction from hidden states and triangulate it through three measures: probing, leave-one-dataset-out (LODO) transfer, and causal intervention. The susceptibility is largely shaped by alignment tuning rather than pretraining: pretrained base models generally cave much less to these biases, and their activations carry much weaker cue-specific signal beyond question content. Within aligned models, each bias has a coherent linear direction that we can both decode and steer along, recovering the unbiased answer across every family we test. The biases do not collapse into a single shared representation, however: cross-bias overlap is model-specific, and even behaviorally similar biases occupy different directions. The same intervention also provides a proof-of-concept debiasing tool, recovering a meaningful share of bias-induced errors while preserving most correct answers across all instruct families. Cue-induced bias is therefore best understood not as a single flaw in LLMs but as a family of causally effective linear directions that are largely shaped by alignment tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
References · 14
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 312
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 207
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Dissociating the Internal Representations of Sycophancy in LLMs
- 2023Instruction-tuning Aligns LLMs to the Human Brain
- 2026Conditional Cognitive Biases in LLMs: How Biased User Turns Modulate In-Context Reasoning
- 2024Have the VLMs Lost Confidence? A Study of Sycophancy in VLMs
- 2026PCA-guided Activation Scaling for Monotonic Bidirectional Control over LLM Sycophancy
- 2025Can you map it to English? The Role of Cross-Lingual Alignment in Multilingual Performance of LLMs
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning
- 2025Detecting the Disturbance: A Nuanced View of Introspective Abilities in LLMs